289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19693744)
21. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Multi-segment ventral stabilization of the lumbar spine: a comparative biomechanical study].
Eysel P; Hopf C; Diop A; Lavaste F
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1995; 133(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7610706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Influence of inlay height on motion characteristics of lumbar segments in total disc replacement].
Weisskopf M; Ohnsorge JA; Martini F; Niethard FU; Birnbaum K
Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 18704840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by finite element analysis.
Chiang MF; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Shih SL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E682-9. PubMed ID: 16946641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of pressure effects on adjacent disk levels after 2-level lumbar constructs: fusion, hybrid, and total disk replacement.
Nunley PD; Jawahar A; Mukherjee DP; Ogden A; Khan Z; Kerr EJ; Cavanaugh DA
Surg Neurol; 2008 Sep; 70(3):247-51; discussion 251. PubMed ID: 18617238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea.
Kettler A; Drumm J; Heuer F; Haeussler K; Mack C; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Feb; 23(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 17981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
Denozière G; Ku DN
J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical performance of the new BeadEx implant in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: restoration and maintenance of height and stability.
Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Shezifi Y; Ohana N; Ben-Arye A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):676-82. PubMed ID: 16567025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
