BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19694530)

  • 1. Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.
    Potdevin L; Ercolani M; Jeong J; Kim IY
    J Endourol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1479-84. PubMed ID: 19694530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A matched-pair comparison between bilateral intrafascial and interfascial nerve-sparing techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Zheng T; Zhang X; Ma X; Li HZ; Gao JP; Cai W; Dong J; Chen GF; Wang BJ; Shi TP; Song EL; Chen WH; Huang QB
    Asian J Androl; 2013 Jul; 15(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 23708458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with a laparoscopic robot-assisted extraperitoneal approach: early oncological and functional results.
    Xylinas E; Ploussard G; Salomon L; Paul A; Gillion N; Laet KD; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
    J Endourol; 2010 Apr; 24(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 20136397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of transperitoneal robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: single centre's experience.
    Ihsan-Tasci A; Simsek A; Dogukan-Torer MB; Sokmen D; Sahin S; Bitkin A; Tugcu V
    Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Mar; 39(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 24856651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics.
    Shikanov S; Woo J; Al-Ahmadie H; Katz MH; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
    Urology; 2009 Sep; 74(3):611-6. PubMed ID: 19616830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves patients' postoperative continence recovery and erectile function: A pooled analysis based on available literatures.
    Wang X; Wu Y; Guo J; Chen H; Weng X; Liu X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(29):e11297. PubMed ID: 30024505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study.
    Khoder WY; Waidelich R; Seitz M; Becker AJ; Buchner A; Trittschler S; Stief CG
    World J Urol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 24752607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.
    Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P
    BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot-assisted laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy with bilateral extended lymph node dissection and intracorporeal studer pouch construction: outcomes of first 12 cases.
    Akbulut Z; Canda AE; Ozcan MF; Atmaca AF; Ozdemir AT; Balbay MD
    J Endourol; 2011 Sep; 25(9):1469-79. PubMed ID: 21830910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrafascial dissection significantly increases positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Mortezavi A; Hermanns T; Seifert HH; Wild PJ; Schmid DM; Sulser T; Eberli D
    Urol Int; 2012; 89(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 22738925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up.
    Galfano A; Di Trapani D; Sozzi F; Strada E; Petralia G; Bramerio M; Ascione A; Gambacorta M; Bocciardi AM
    Eur Urol; 2013 Dec; 64(6):974-80. PubMed ID: 23856036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation.
    Zorn KC; Gofrit ON; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):755-62; discussion 763. PubMed ID: 17084520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Asimakopoulos AD; Pereira Fraga CT; Annino F; Pasqualetti P; Calado AA; Mugnier C
    J Sex Med; 2011 May; 8(5):1503-12. PubMed ID: 21324093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of outcomes for interfascial and intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Stolzenburg JU; Kallidonis P; Do M; Dietel A; Häfner T; Rabenalt R; Sakellaropoulos G; Ganzer R; Paasch U; Horn LC; Liatsikos E
    Urology; 2010 Sep; 76(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 20573384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Srivastava A; Chopra S; Pham A; Sooriakumaran P; Durand M; Chughtai B; Gruschow S; Peyser A; Harneja N; Leung R; Lee R; Herman M; Robinson B; Shevchuk M; Tewari A
    Eur Urol; 2013 Mar; 63(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 22901982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [RALP: comparison of the oncological and functional outcomes of the intrafascial and the interfascial approaches].
    Al-Mamari SA; Quintens H; Mentine N; Burté C; Rouyer N; Jacob G; Amiel J
    Prog Urol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 25245504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Srinualnad S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Mar; 91(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 18575292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control.
    Xylinas E; Durand X; Ploussard G; Campeggi A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21719321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detrusorrhaphy and Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Recovery of Continence and Potency: Surgical Feasibility, One-Year Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Lee YS; Shin TY
    Urol J; 2020 Jul; 18(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 32715457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.