These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19695280)
1. Perceptual comparison of features within and between objects: a new look. Harrison SJ; Feldman J Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2790-9. PubMed ID: 19695280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects. Hommuk K; Bachmann T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective storage and maintenance of an object's features in visual working memory. Woodman GF; Vogel EK Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):223-9. PubMed ID: 18605507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation into the cause of orientation-sensitivity in haptic object recognition. Lawson R Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(3):293-314. PubMed ID: 21864466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binding identity and orientation in object recognition. Harris IM; Harris JA; Corballis MC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):153-167. PubMed ID: 30771110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational mechanisms of object constancy for visual recognition revealed by event-related potentials. Leek EC; Atherton CJ; Thierry G Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 17267003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of feature conjunction on object inversion and conversion effects. Bushmakin MA; James TW Perception; 2014; 43(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 24689130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition. Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. View combination in moving objects: the role of motion in discriminating between novel views of similar and distinctive objects by humans and pigeons. Friedman A; Vuong QC; Spetch ML Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):594-607. PubMed ID: 19232366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mental rotation depends on the number of objects rather than on the number of image fragments. Koning A; van Lier R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Sep; 117(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 15288229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task. Kristjánsson A Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The return of object-based attention: selection of multiple-region objects. Matsukura M; Vecera SP Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1163-75. PubMed ID: 17355040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rotating objects to determine orientation, not identity: evidence from a backward-masking/dual-task procedure. De Caro SA; Reeves A Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1356-66. PubMed ID: 11143448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of global cues in the perceptual grouping of natural shapes. Elder JH; Oleskiw TD; Fruend I J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):14. PubMed ID: 30458519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural Discriminability of Object Features Predicts Perceptual Organization. Ward EJ; Chun MM Psychol Sci; 2016 Jan; 27(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26581945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From geons to structure. A note on object representation. Leeuwenberg E; Van der Helm P; Van Lier R Perception; 1994; 23(5):505-15. PubMed ID: 7800466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]