BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19695980)

  • 1. Beamformer suppression of cochlear implant artifacts in an electroencephalography dataset.
    Wong DD; Gordon KA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Dec; 56(12):2851-7. PubMed ID: 19695980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source localization of event-related potentials incorporating spatial notch filters.
    Spyrou L; Sanei S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2232-9. PubMed ID: 18713692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent component analysis for auditory evoked potentials and cochlear implant artifact estimation.
    Castañeda-Villa N; James CJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 58(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 20813628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimization of cochlear implant stimulus artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials.
    Gilley PM; Sharma A; Dorman M; Finley CC; Panch AS; Martin K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1772-82. PubMed ID: 16807102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatio-temporal reconstruction of bilateral auditory steady-state responses using MEG beamformers.
    Popescu M; Popescu EA; Chan T; Blunt SD; Lewine JD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1092-102. PubMed ID: 18334401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel method for device-related electroencephalography artifact suppression to explore cochlear implant-related cortical changes in single-sided deafness.
    Kim K; Punte AK; Mertens G; Van de Heyning P; Park KJ; Choi H; Choi JW; Song JJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Nov; 255():22-8. PubMed ID: 26231621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semi-automatic attenuation of cochlear implant artifacts for the evaluation of late auditory evoked potentials.
    Viola FC; De Vos M; Hine J; Sandmann P; Bleeck S; Eyles J; Debener S
    Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 284(1-2):6-15. PubMed ID: 22234161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimization of cochlear implant artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials in children.
    Bakhos D; Roux S; Robier A; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Lescanne E; Bruneau N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Nov; 76(11):1627-32. PubMed ID: 22910837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial filters and automated spike detection based on brain topographies improve sensitivity of EEG-fMRI studies in focal epilepsy.
    Siniatchkin M; Moeller F; Jacobs J; Stephani U; Boor R; Wolff S; Jansen O; Siebner H; Scherg M
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):834-43. PubMed ID: 17627849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method for removing cochlear implant artifact.
    Friesen LM; Picton TW
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):95-106. PubMed ID: 19878712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of the eye-blink artifacts from EEGs via STF-TS modeling and robust minimum variance beamforming.
    Nazarpour K; Wongsawat Y; Sanei S; Chambers JA; Oraintara S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2221-31. PubMed ID: 18713691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Canonical correlation analysis applied to remove muscle artifacts from the electroencephalogram.
    De Clercq W; Vergult A; Vanrumste B; Van Paesschen W; Van Huffel S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 1):2583-7. PubMed ID: 17153216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the cochlear implant artifact correction tool for auditory electrophysiology.
    Miller S; Zhang Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Aug; 577():51-5. PubMed ID: 24946164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory evoked potentials for the assessment of depth of anaesthesia: different configurations of artefact detection algorithms.
    Luecke D; Stockmanns G; Gallinat M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17313341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer source reconstruction technique in the presence of additive low-rank interference.
    Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS; Poeppel D; Marantz A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 14723498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic correction of artifact from single-trial event-related potentials by blind source separation using second order statistics only.
    Ting KH; Fung PC; Chang CQ; Chan FH
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Oct; 28(8):780-94. PubMed ID: 16406675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NeuMonD: a tool for the development of new indicators of anaesthetic effect.
    Stockmanns G; Ningler M; Omerovic A; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 17313342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.