These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19696156)

  • 1. What they mean by "good science': the medical community's response to boutique fetal ultrasounds.
    Raucher MS
    J Med Philos; 2009 Oct; 34(5):528-44. PubMed ID: 19696156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ethical critique of boutique fetal imaging:a case for the medicalization of fetal imaging.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 15671998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical analysis of non-medical fetal ultrasound.
    Leung JL; Pang SM
    Nurs Ethics; 2009 Sep; 16(5):637-46. PubMed ID: 19671649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal three-dimensional ultrasound: perception of sonographers, sonologists and undergraduate students.
    Lee S; Pretorius DH; Asfoor S; Hull AD; Newton RP; Hollenbach K; Nelson TR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 17497645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The safe use of non-medical ultrasound: a summary of the proceedings of the joint safety symposium of ISUOG and WFUMB.
    Abramowicz JS; Barnett SB; ;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 33(5):617-20. PubMed ID: 19402127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risky business: applying risk/benefit analysis consistently in entertainment ultrasound.
    De Crespigny L; Douglas T; Wilkinson D; Savulescu J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):613-5. PubMed ID: 19953570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The problem with "keepsake" fetal ultrasound: ECRI and other medical professionals cite potential risks.
    Health Devices; 2005 Nov; 34(11):378-80. PubMed ID: 16454118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006.
    Siddique J; Lauderdale DS; VanderWeele TJ; Lantos JD
    Med Care; 2009 Nov; 47(11):1129-35. PubMed ID: 19786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Keepsake ultrasounds worth the risk?
    Scholz C
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(4):373-5. PubMed ID: 21406712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keepsake prenatal ultrasound: pros and cons of non-medically indicated imaging.
    Goodnight W; Chescheir N
    N C Med J; 2014; 75(2):138-9. PubMed ID: 24663140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Picture perfect: benefits and risk of fetal 3D ultrasound.
    Wiseman CS; Kiehl EM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2007; 32(2):102-9; quiz 110-1. PubMed ID: 17356416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The business of baby pictures: controversy brews over "keepsake" fetal ultrasounds.
    Voelker R
    JAMA; 2005 Jan; 293(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 15632321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ISUOG Statement on the non-medical use of ultrasound, 2009.
    Abramowicz J; Brezinka C; Salvesen K; ter Haar G; ;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 33(5):617. PubMed ID: 19402125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Keepsake ultrasounds: more than just another pretty face.
    Nielsen FR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 194(5):1501; author reply 1501-2. PubMed ID: 16647939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unsound ultrasounds? An examination of state legislation regulating non-medical ultrasound use and private ownership.
    Uhles JM
    J Leg Med; 2007; 28(2):263-82. PubMed ID: 17558796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ISUOG-WFUMB statement on the non-medical use of ultrasound, 2011.
    ; Salvesen K; Lees C; Abramowicz J; Brezinka C; Ter Haar G; Maršál K;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 38(5):608. PubMed ID: 22028045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Prenatal ultrasonography requires medical indication. The risks are mostly uninvestigated, some findings are unsettling].
    Axelsson O; Marsál K; Valentin L
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Apr 18-24; 104(16):1216-7. PubMed ID: 17536349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonmedical use of ultrasound in pregnancy: ethical issues, patients' rights and potential misuse.
    Brezinka C
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1233-6. PubMed ID: 20598435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The complexity of fetal imaging: reconciling clinical care with patient entertainment.
    Simonsen SE; Branch DW; Rose NC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 112(6):1351-1354. PubMed ID: 19037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are prenatal ultrasounds safe for the developing brain?
    Gressens P; Hüppi PS
    Pediatr Res; 2007 Mar; 61(3):265-6. PubMed ID: 17314680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.