These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19696381)

  • 1. Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys.
    Blumberg SJ; Luke JV
    Am J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 99(10):1806-10. PubMed ID: 19696381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution.
    Blumberg SJ; Luke JV; Cynamon ML
    Am J Public Health; 2006 May; 96(5):926-31. PubMed ID: 16571707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Growing cell-phone population and noncoverage bias in traditional random digit dial telephone health surveys.
    Lee S; Brick JM; Brown ER; Grant D
    Health Serv Res; 2010 Aug; 45(4):1121-39. PubMed ID: 20500221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surveying alcohol and other drug use through telephone sampling: a comparison of landline and mobile phone samples.
    Livingston M; Dietze P; Ferris J; Pennay D; Hayes L; Lenton S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():41. PubMed ID: 23497161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013.
    Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Taylor AW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27089889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving public health surveillance using a dual-frame survey of landline and cell phone numbers.
    Hu SS; Balluz L; Battaglia MP; Frankel MR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Mar; 173(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 21343246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring health behaviors and landline telephones: potential coverage bias in a low-income, rural population.
    Shebl F; Poppell CE; Zhan M; Dwyer DM; Hopkins AB; Groves C; Reed F; Devadason C; Steinberger EK
    Public Health Rep; 2009; 124(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 19618786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing cell phone usage among Hispanics: implications for telephone surveys.
    Lee S; Elkasabi M; Streja L
    Am J Public Health; 2012 Jun; 102(6):e19-24. PubMed ID: 22515863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January-December 2007.
    Blumberg SJ; Luke JV; Davidson G; Davern ME; Yu TC; Soderberg K
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2009 Mar; (14):1-13, 16. PubMed ID: 19418704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Potential selection bias in telephone surveys: landline and mobile phones].
    Garcia-Continente X; Pérez-Giménez A; López MJ; Nebot M
    Gac Sanit; 2014; 28(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 24300381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodologic changes in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 2011 and potential effects on prevalence estimates.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2012 Jun; 61(22):410-3. PubMed ID: 22672976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Profiling the mobile-only population in Australia: insights from the Australian National Health Survey.
    Baffour B; Haynes M; Dinsdale S; Western M; Pennay D
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2016 Oct; 40(5):443-447. PubMed ID: 27372061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vigitel--Aracaju, Sergipe, 2008: the effects of post-stratification adjustments in correcting biases due to the small amount of households with a landline telephone.
    Bernal RT; Malta DC; de Morais Neto OL; Claro RM; Mendoça BC; de Oliveira AC; da Silva NN
    Rev Bras Epidemiol; 2014; 17(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 24896790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Telephone service interruption weighting adjustments for state health insurance surveys.
    Davern M; Lepkowski J; Call KT; Arnold N; Johnson TL; Goldsteen K; Todd-Malmlov A; Blewett LA
    Inquiry; 2004; 41(3):280-90. PubMed ID: 15669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Home landline telephone coverage and potential bias in epidemiological surveys.
    Bernal R; Silva NN
    Rev Saude Publica; 2009 Jun; 43(3):421-6. PubMed ID: 19377748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys.
    Frankel MR; Srinath KP; Hoaglin DC; Battaglia MP; Smith PJ; Wright RA; Khare M
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1611-26. PubMed ID: 12704619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008.
    Dal Grande E; Taylor AW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Aug; 10():77. PubMed ID: 20738884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of the mode of survey administration on estimates of daily smoking for mobile phone only users.
    Hanna J; Cordery DV; Steel DG; Davis W; Harrold TC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):65. PubMed ID: 28427334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential use of telephone surveys for non-communicable disease surveillance in developing countries: evidence from a national household survey in Lebanon.
    Sibai AM; Ghandour LA; Chaaban R; Mokdad AH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():64. PubMed ID: 27245163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias in telephone surveys that do not sample cell phones: uses and limits of poststratification adjustments.
    Call KT; Davern M; Boudreaux M; Johnson PJ; Nelson J
    Med Care; 2011 Apr; 49(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 21407032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.