These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19696487)

  • 1. Speech with gaps: effects of periodic interruptions on speech intelligibility.
    Schnotz A; Digeser F; Hoppe U
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 19696487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence.
    Ghitza O; Greenberg S
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(1-2):113-26. PubMed ID: 19390234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The gaps-in-noise test: gap detection thresholds in normal-hearing young adults.
    Samelli AG; Schochat E
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):238-45. PubMed ID: 18465408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the Mandarin pediatric speech intelligibility (MPSI) test.
    Zheng Y; Soli SD; Wang K; Meng J; Meng Z; Xu K; Tao Y
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):718-28. PubMed ID: 19606371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise.
    Ozimek E; Kutzner D; Sek A; Wicher A
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):433-43. PubMed ID: 19925330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception abilities of adults with dyslexia: is there any evidence for a true deficit?
    Hazan V; Messaoud-Galusi S; Rosen S; Nouwens S; Shakespeare B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1510-29. PubMed ID: 19635940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Associations and dissociations between psychoacoustic abilities and speech perception in adolescents with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Segal O; Algom D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):956-72. PubMed ID: 19064905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cantonese tone recognition with enhanced temporal periodicity cues.
    Yuan M; Lee T; Yuen KC; Soli SD; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 19603889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of speech task on intelligibility in dysarthria: a case study of Parkinson's disease.
    Kempler D; Van Lancker D
    Brain Lang; 2002 Mar; 80(3):449-64. PubMed ID: 11896652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli.
    Lister J; Tarver K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 15157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M; Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.