These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19696800)

  • 1. Awareness of smoking risks and attitudes towards graphic health warning labels on cigarette packs: a cross-cultural study of two populations in Singapore and Scotland.
    Ng DH; Roxburgh ST; Sanjay S; Au Eong KG
    Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):864-8. PubMed ID: 19696800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do graphic health warning labels have an impact on adolescents' smoking-related beliefs and behaviours?
    White V; Webster B; Wakefield M
    Addiction; 2008 Sep; 103(9):1562-71. PubMed ID: 18783508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cigarette pack warning labels in Russia: how graphic should they be?
    Wade B; Merrill RM; Lindsay GB
    Eur J Public Health; 2011 Jun; 21(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 20660172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass media campaigns designed to support new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets: evidence of a complementary relationship.
    Brennan E; Durkin SJ; Cotter T; Harper T; Wakefield MA
    Tob Control; 2011 Nov; 20(6):412-8. PubMed ID: 21474501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Awareness and impact of New York City's graphic point-of-sale tobacco health warning signs.
    Coady MH; Chan CA; Auer K; Farley SM; Kilgore EA; Kansagra SM
    Tob Control; 2013 May; 22(e1):e51-6. PubMed ID: 22730446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: will they make a difference to adolescents?
    McCool J; Webb L; Cameron LD; Hoek J
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Apr; 74(8):1269-73. PubMed ID: 22385817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers.
    Peters E; Romer D; Slovic P; Jamieson KH; Wharfield L; Mertz CK; Carpenter SM
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2007 Apr; 9(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 17454702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptions of blindness related to smoking: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.
    Bidwell G; Sahu A; Edwards R; Harrison RA; Thornton J; Kelly SP
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Sep; 19(9):945-8. PubMed ID: 16151433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cigarette pack labelling in 12 countries at different levels of economic development.
    Mir H; Buchanan D; Gilmore A; McKee M; Yusuf S; Chow CK
    J Public Health Policy; 2011 May; 32(2):146-64. PubMed ID: 21368847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The appeal of smokeless tobacco products among young Canadian smokers: the impact of pictorial health warnings and relative risk messages.
    Callery WE; Hammond D; O'Connor RJ; Fong GT
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2011 May; 13(5):373-83. PubMed ID: 21357730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linking mass media campaigns to pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages: a cross-sectional study to evaluate effects among Mexican smokers.
    Thrasher JF; Murukutla N; Pérez-Hernández R; Alday J; Arillo-Santillán E; Cedillo C; Gutierrez JP
    Tob Control; 2013 May; 22(e1):e57-65. PubMed ID: 22752271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of graphic cigarette warning labels and smoke-free law on health awareness and thoughts of quitting in Taiwan.
    Chang FC; Chung CH; Yu PT; Chao KY
    Health Educ Res; 2011 Apr; 26(2):179-91. PubMed ID: 21084424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-affirmation reduces smokers' defensiveness to graphic on-pack cigarette warning labels.
    Harris PR; Mayle K; Mabbott L; Napper L
    Health Psychol; 2007 Jul; 26(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 17605563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adolescents' perceptions of Canadian cigarette package warning labels: investigating the effects of message framing.
    Goodall C; Appiah O
    Health Commun; 2008; 23(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 18443999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers.
    Hoek J; Wong C; Gendall P; Louviere J; Cong K
    Tob Control; 2011 May; 20(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 20966135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Impact of cigarette package health warnings with pictures in Mexico: results from a survey of smokers in Guadalajara].
    Thrasher JF; Pérez-Hernández R; Arillo-Santillán E; Barrientos-Gutiérrez I
    Salud Publica Mex; 2012 Jun; 54(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 22689163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The new EU cigarette health warnings benefit smokers who want to quit the habit: results from the Dutch Continuous Survey of Smoking Habits.
    Willemsen MC
    Eur J Public Health; 2005 Aug; 15(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 15975953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the impact of different cigarette package warning label policies: the auction method.
    Thrasher JF; Rousu MC; Anaya-Ocampo R; Reynales-Shigematsu LM; Arillo-Santillán E; Hernández-Avila M
    Addict Behav; 2007 Dec; 32(12):2916-25. PubMed ID: 17630221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Desensitisation to cigarette package graphic health warnings: a cohort comparison between London and Singapore.
    Ratneswaran C; Chisnall B; Li M; Tan S; Douiri A; Anantham D; Steier J
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012693. PubMed ID: 27798017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graphic tobacco health warnings: which genre to choose?
    Sobani Z; Nizami S; Raza E; ul Ain Baloch N; Khan JA
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2010 Mar; 14(3):356-61. PubMed ID: 20132628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.