These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19697189)

  • 41. Accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight before induction of labor in diabetic pregnancies and pregnancies with suspected fetal macrosomia.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Mashiach R; Hod M; Meisner I
    J Perinat Med; 2003; 31(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 12825478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Use of serial ultrasound to identify periods of fetal growth restriction in relation to neonatal anthropometry.
    Hemachandra AH; Klebanoff MA
    Am J Hum Biol; 2006; 18(6):791-7. PubMed ID: 17039476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [The role of echography in the management of fetal macrosomia].
    Rosati P; Exacoustos C
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Jun; 47(6):245-50. PubMed ID: 7478092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Estimation of fetal weight by external abdominal measurements and fundal height measurement near term for the detection of intra-uterine growth retardation].
    Ducarme G; Seguro E; Chesnoy V; Davitian C; Luton D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Nov; 40(11):642-6. PubMed ID: 23102574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prediction of fetal macrosomia by single ultrasonic fetal biometry.
    Chen CP; Chang FM; Chang CH; Lin YS; Chou CY; Ko HC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 Jan; 92(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8099822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Identification of fetal growth retardation: comparison of Doppler waveform indices and serial ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumference and fetal weight.
    Chang TC; Robson SC; Spencer JA; Gallivan S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):230-6. PubMed ID: 8336870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Diagnosis of macrosomia in the postdates population: combining sonographic estimates of fetal weight with glucose challenge testing.
    Sylvestre G; Divon MY; Onyeije C; Fisher M
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(5):287-90. PubMed ID: 11132584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
    Combs CA; Rosenn B; Miodovnik M; Siddiqi TA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fetal macrosomia prediction in the real world of obstetrics.
    Stanislaw H; Nahum GG
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2011; 29(4):334-5; authors reply 336. PubMed ID: 21677433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Individualized growth assessment of fetal soft tissue using fractional thigh volume.
    Lee W; Deter RL; McNie B; Gonçalves LF; Espinoza J; Chaiworapongsa T; Romero R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 24(7):766-74. PubMed ID: 15586365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Intrauterine risk factors for precocious atherosclerosis.
    Skilton MR
    Pediatrics; 2008 Mar; 121(3):570-4. PubMed ID: 18310207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
    De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of a single fetal weight estimation at 29-34 weeks in diabetic pregnancies: can it predict large-for-gestational-age infants at term?
    Ben-Haroush A; Chen R; Hadar E; Hod M; Yogev Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):497.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17980186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Subcutaneous tissue thickness cannot be used to distinguish abnormalities of fetal growth.
    Hill LM; Guzick D; Boyles D; Merolillo C; Ballone A; Gmiter P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):268-71. PubMed ID: 1635742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Prenatal prediction of neonatal growth status in twins using individualized growth assessment.
    Deter RL; Xu B; Milner LL
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 Feb; 24(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 8621807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fetal size and growth velocity in the prediction of the large for gestational age (LGA) infant in a glucose impaired population.
    Kernaghan D; Ola B; Fraser RB; Farrell T; Owen P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jun; 132(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 16930805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Relationship between fetal abdominal circumference and birth weight: clinical findings in 1475 pregnancies].
    Shi CY; Zhang XX; Jin YZ; Dong Y; Zhang YY; Lin L; Li XJ; Zhang BR
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(11):732-4. PubMed ID: 16324244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Detection of intrauterine fetal growth retardation with abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight using cross-sectional growth curves.
    Simon NV; O'Connor TJ; Shearer DM
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1990; 18(9):685-90. PubMed ID: 2174918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
    Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.
    McLaren RA; Puckett JL; Chauhan SP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 7898834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.