BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19697192)

  • 21. Evaluation of minimally invasive analysis system for cough leak point pressure measurement.
    Kocjancic E; Tarrano E; Panella M; Crivellaro S; Smith JJ; Maso G; Favro M; Ceratti G; Gontero P; Frea B
    J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):994-7. PubMed ID: 15311021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Urinary incontinence-assessment in women: stress, urge or both?
    McKertich K
    Aust Fam Physician; 2008 Mar; 37(3):112-7. PubMed ID: 18345358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Urodynamic evaluation of the bladder and pelvic floor.
    Bradley CS; Smith KE; Kreder KJ
    Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2008 Sep; 37(3):539-52, vii. PubMed ID: 18793995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Urodynamics: examining the current role of UDS testing. What is the role of urodynamic testing in light of recent AUA urodynamics and overactive bladder guidelines and the VALUE study?
    Brown ET; Krlin RM; Winters JC
    Curr Urol Rep; 2013 Oct; 14(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 23904217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Primer: questionnaires versus urodynamics in the evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunction-one, both or none?
    Chapple CR
    Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2005 Nov; 2(11):555-64. PubMed ID: 16474599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Practical use of the new American Urological Association adult urodynamics guidelines.
    Patel BN; Kobashi KC
    Curr Urol Rep; 2013 Jun; 14(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 23494881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bladder sensations during filling cystometry are different according to urodynamic diagnosis.
    Digesu GA; Basra R; Khullar V; Hendricken C; Camarata M; Kelleher C
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 18973145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality control in urodynamics: Analysis of an international multi-center study.
    Renganathan A; Cartwright R; Cardozo L; Robinson D; Srikrishna S
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 19090592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of a real-time urodynamic measure of urinary sensation.
    Lowenstein L; FitzGerald MP; Kenton K; Brubaker L; Gruenwald I; Papier I; Durazo-Arvizu RA; Elliot C; Mueller ER; Vardi Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):661.e1-4; discussion 661.e4-5. PubMed ID: 18377858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interrater reliability of filling cystometrogram interpretation in a multicenter study.
    Zimmern P; Nager CW; Albo M; Fitzgerald MP; McDermott S;
    J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):2174-7. PubMed ID: 16697832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recommendations for urodynamic assessment in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence.
    Takacs EB; Zimmern PE
    Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2006 Oct; 3(10):544-50. PubMed ID: 17031379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The practice guideline 'Urinary incontinence' (first revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of urology].
    Heesakkers JP; Mulders PF
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Nov; 152(47):2544-5. PubMed ID: 19174933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Contribution of VLPP (Valsalva leak point pressure) in the urodynamic assessment].
    Ciofu C; Haab F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Feb; 32(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 15123141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Urinary incontinence in women.
    Wilkinson E
    Nurs Times; 2006 Nov 28-Dec 4; 102(48):23-4. PubMed ID: 17193773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stress urinary incontinence: issues and answers for women.
    Appleby S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jan; 45(1):44-8, 50-3. PubMed ID: 10085971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The rate of increase in urinary flow rate during micturition: a valuable urodynamic parameter for the diagnosis and differentiation of abnormalities of micturition in women.
    von Fischer B; Dreher E; Adam PJ; Maurer HP
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 78():223-30. PubMed ID: 7335741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A critical review of diagnostic criteria for evaluating patients with symptomatic stress urinary incontinence.
    Chapple CR; Wein AJ; Artibani W; Brubaker L; Haab F; Heesakkers JP; Lightner D
    BJU Int; 2005 Feb; 95(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 15679788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Problems in the clinical diagnosis of stress incontinence.
    Horbach NS
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Aug; 35(8):751-7. PubMed ID: 2213735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comments on "A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery" (N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1987-1997) From the Italian Society of Urodynamics.
    Finazzi-Agrò E; Serati M; Salvatore S; Del Popolo G
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Mar; 32(3):301-2. PubMed ID: 23023985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Editorial comment. Do women with pure stress urinary incontinence need urodynamics?
    Dmochowski RR; Dmochowski R
    Urology; 2009 Aug; 74(2):281-2. PubMed ID: 19646610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.