141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19697622)
1. Comparison of three vascular endothelial markers in the evaluation of microvessel density in breast cancer.
da Silva BB; Lopes-Costa PV; dos Santos AR; de Sousa-Júnior EC; Alencar AP; Pires CG; Rosal MA
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 19697622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of different immunohistochemical methods in the assessment of angiogenesis: lack of prognostic value in a group of 77 selected node-negative breast carcinomas.
Siitonen SM; Haapasalo HK; Rantala IS; Helin HJ; Isola JJ
Mod Pathol; 1995 Sep; 8(7):745-52. PubMed ID: 8539232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of angiogenesis in cervical cancer: a comparison among three endothelial cell markers.
Vieira SC; Zeferino LC; Da Silva BB; Aparecida Pinto G; Vassallo J; Carasan GA; De Moraes NG
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Apr; 93(1):121-4. PubMed ID: 15047224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining the technique of angiogenesis assessment in invasive breast cancer.
Martin L; Green B; Renshaw C; Lowe D; Rudland P; Leinster SJ; Winstanley J
Br J Cancer; 1997; 76(8):1046-54. PubMed ID: 9376265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vascular density and phenotype around ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.
Teo NB; Shoker BS; Jarvis C; Martin L; Sloane JP; Holcombe C
Br J Cancer; 2002 Mar; 86(6):905-11. PubMed ID: 11953822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of intratumoral endothelial cell proliferation with microvessel density (tumor angiogenesis) and tumor cell proliferation in breast carcinoma.
Vartanian RK; Weidner N
Am J Pathol; 1994 Jun; 144(6):1188-94. PubMed ID: 7515558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Microvessel Density with Prognostic Factors in Invasive Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast.
Şener E; Şipal S; Gündoğdu C
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2016; 32(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 27562390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased microvessel density in mucinous compared with malignant serous and benign tumours of the ovary.
Orre M; Lotfi-Miri M; Mamers P; Rogers PA
Br J Cancer; 1998 Jun; 77(12):2204-9. PubMed ID: 9649134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microvessel area using automated image analysis is reproducible and is associated with prognosis in breast cancer.
Sullivan CA; Ghosh S; Ocal IT; Camp RL; Rimm DL; Chung GG
Hum Pathol; 2009 Feb; 40(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 18799189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tumour-type-specific capillary endothelial cell stainability in malignant B-cell lymphomas using antibodies against CD31, CD34 and Factor VIII.
Norrby K; Ridell B
APMIS; 2003 Apr; 111(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 12780523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thymidine phosphorylase (platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor), microvessel density and clinical outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Yamamoto A; Dhar DK; El-Assal ON; Igarashi M; Tabara H; Nagasue N
J Hepatol; 1998 Aug; 29(2):290-9. PubMed ID: 9722211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Guidi AJ; Fischer L; Harris JR; Schnitt SJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Apr; 86(8):614-9. PubMed ID: 7511693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphometric study of tumor angiogenesis as a new prognostic factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Rubio L; Burgos JS; Morera C; Vera-Sempere FJ
Pathol Oncol Res; 2000; 6(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 11033462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microvessel density and angiogenesis in primary hepatic malignancies: Differential expression of CD31 and VEGFR-2 in hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Bösmüller H; Pfefferle V; Bittar Z; Scheble V; Horger M; Sipos B; Fend F
Pathol Res Pract; 2018 Aug; 214(8):1136-1141. PubMed ID: 29935812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic value of vascular density and cell proliferation in breast cancer patients.
Tynninen O; von Boguslawski K; Aronen HJ; Paavonen T
Pathol Res Pract; 1999; 195(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 10048092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of visual and automated assessment of microvessel density and their impact on outcome in primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer.
Mohammed ZM; Orange C; McMillan DC; Mallon E; Doughty JC; Edwards J; Going JJ
Hum Pathol; 2013 Aug; 44(8):1688-95. PubMed ID: 23574778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative immunohistochemistry of factor VIII-related antigen in breast carcinoma: a comparison of computer-assisted image analysis with established counting methods.
Kohlberger PD; Obermair A; Sliutz G; Heinzl H; Koelbl H; Breitenecker G; Gitsch G; Kainz C
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 105(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 8659444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angiogenesis in the progression of breast ductal proliferations.
Carpenter PM; Chen WP; Mendez A; McLaren CE; Su MY
Int J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 19(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 19403546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconsideration of the clinical and histopathological significance of angiogenesis in prostate cancer: Usefulness and limitations of microvessel density measurement.
Miyata Y; Sakai H
Int J Urol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):806-15. PubMed ID: 26153072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphometric and immunohistochemical study of angiogenic marker expressions in invasive ductal carcinoma of human breast.
Safwat MD; Habib F; Elayat A; Oweiss N; Reffat S; Algaidi S
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2009 Aug; 68(3):144-55. PubMed ID: 19722158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
