478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19698817)
1. An economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation.
Kraemer DF; Yen PY; Nichols M
Contraception; 2009 Sep; 80(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19698817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 16036190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Healthcare Costs Among Commercially Insured Women in the United States Who Underwent Hysteroscopic Sterilization Versus Laparoscopic Bilateral Tubal Ligation Sterilization.
Carney PI; Yao J; Lin J; Law A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 May; 26(5):483-490. PubMed ID: 28157426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.
Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; Wagie AE; Williams AR; Famuyide AO
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17218238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tubal sterilization by laparoscopy or hysteroscopy: which is the most cost-effective procedure?
Franchini M; Cianferoni L; Lippi G; Calonaci F; Calzolari S; Mazzini M; Florio P
Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4 Suppl):1499-502. PubMed ID: 18930457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.
Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Shade GH; Diamond MP; Berman JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18996773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization (essure) in women with an intrauterine device.
Agostini A; Crochet P; Petrakian M; Estrade JP; Cravello L; Gamerre M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 18439497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the essure tubal sterilization procedure and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
Thiel JA; Carson GD
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Jul; 30(7):581-585. PubMed ID: 18644179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010.
Fernandez H; Legendre G; Blein C; Lamarsalle L; Panel P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():133-7. PubMed ID: 24993770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Essure hysteroscopic sterilization versus interval laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation: a comparative effectiveness review.
Ouzounelli M; Reaven NL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):342-52. PubMed ID: 25499775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: a health economic literature review.
Toronto Health Economic and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2013; 13(22):1-25. PubMed ID: 24228085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.
Sinha D; Kalathy V; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
BJOG; 2007 Jun; 114(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 17516957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ICSI pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic placement of Essure devices for hydrosalpinx in laparoscopic contraindicated patients.
Ozgur K; Bulut H; Berkkanoglu M; Coetzee K; Kaya G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 24813749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: a systematic review of the Essure system.
Hurskainen R; Hovi SL; Gissler M; Grahn R; Kukkonen-Harjula K; Nord-Saari M; Mäkelä M
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jun; 94(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 19409549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating room.
Nichols M; Carter JF; Fylstra DL; Childers M;
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 16962530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hysteroscopic tubal occlusion: sterilization after failed laparoscopic or abdominal approaches.
Podolsky ML; Desai NA; Waters TP; Nyirjesy P
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 2):513-5. PubMed ID: 18239004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcervical sterilization.
Abbott J
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 17625413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cost effects of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic female sterilization].
Rajecki M; Blomqvist S; Väisänen S; Jokinen E; Kyöstilä SL; Nord-Saari M; Rissanen P; Hurskainen R
Duodecim; 2014; 130(8):823-31. PubMed ID: 24822333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization.
Magos A; Chapman L
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 31(3):705-19, xii. PubMed ID: 15450329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
Lannon BM; Lee SY
Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
