These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19699464)

  • 1. Revision in artificial disc replacement.
    Ross ER
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):773-5. PubMed ID: 19699464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controversial topics in surgery: degenerative disc disease: disc replacement. For.
    Wilson-MacDonald J; Boeree N
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Jan; 89(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17316511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: "prospective, randomized multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar tool disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up".
    Guyer RD
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):360; author reply 361-3. PubMed ID: 20362255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motion preservation technologies: alternatives to spinal fusion.
    Singh K; An HS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Sep; 35(9):411-6. PubMed ID: 17036776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of total disc arthroplasty: a canine model.
    Taylor BA; Okubadejo GO; Patel AA; Talcott MR; Imamura T; Hu N; Cunningham BW
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Apr; 37(4):E64-70. PubMed ID: 18535683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.
    Huang RC; Girardi FP; Lim MR; Cammisa FP
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 15950686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of the Charité lumbar artificial disc prosthesis: surgical technique.
    de Maat GH; Punt IM; van Rhijn LW; Schurink GW; van Ooij A
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 19525788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: Sasso R, Heller J, Hacker B, Smucker J. Artificial disc versus fusion. A prospective, randomized study with 2-years follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 2007;32:2933-40.
    Botelho RV
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):1156-7; author reply 1157. PubMed ID: 18449052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical summary statement.
    McAfee PC; Polly DW; Cunningham B; Gaines B; Hallab N; Lubicky J; Lenke L; Bridwell K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S196-8. PubMed ID: 14560192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial disc prosthesis: design concepts and criteria.
    Lee CK; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):209S-218S. PubMed ID: 15541669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goals of cervical disc replacement.
    Albert TJ; Eichenbaum MD
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):292S-293S. PubMed ID: 15541679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty.
    Kostuik JP
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):289S-291S. PubMed ID: 15541678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controversial topics in surgery: degenerative disc disease: disc replacement. Against.
    Khan SN; Stirling AJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Jan; 89(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17326280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Revision of a lumbar disc arthroplasty following late infection" (by Jeffrey M. Spivak and Anthony M. Petrizzo).
    Tropiano P
    Eur Spine J; 2010 May; 19(5):682-4. PubMed ID: 19937061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The relation of artificial intervertebral disc replacement and spondylodesis].
    Wang P
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 15808066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Replacement of lumbosacral intervertebral disks using artificial prostheses: surgical tactics and technique].
    Konovalov NA; Shevelev IN; Kungurtsev VV; Zelenkov PV; Nazarenko AG
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2008; (3):25-30; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 19062592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.