These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19700226)

  • 1. The use of fixatives for response to a radiation dispersal devise attack--a review of the current (2009) state-of-the-art.
    Parra RR; Medina VF; Conca JL
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Nov; 100(11):923-34. PubMed ID: 19700226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling of the EMRAS urban working group hypothetical scenario using the RESRAD-RDD methodology.
    Kamboj S; Cheng JJ; Yu C; Domotor S; Wallo A
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 19403213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
    Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Requirements for estimation of doses from contaminants dispersed by a 'dirty bomb' explosion in an urban area.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1005-11. PubMed ID: 19427717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Details in relation to emergency planning in case of undesired dispersion of radioactivity].
    Hardeman F
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):341-51. PubMed ID: 16408830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Schou-Jensen L; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 18550515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
    Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rays as weapons.
    Vogel H
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Aug; 63(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 17630244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Realistic radiological dispersal device hazard boundaries and ramifications for early consequence management decisions.
    Harper FT; Musolino SV; Wente WB
    Health Phys; 2007 Jul; 93(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17563488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How do we combine science and regulations for decision making following a terrorist incident involving radioactive materials?
    Poston JW; Ford JR
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 19820465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An integrated physical dispersion and behavioral response model for risk assessment of radiological dispersion device (RDD) events.
    Dombroski MJ; Fischbeck PS
    Risk Anal; 2006 Apr; 26(2):501-14. PubMed ID: 16573636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exercise Maritime Response (EXMR): lessons learned for population monitoring and communications.
    Kramer GH; Johnson S; Hauck B; Capello K; Quayle D
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5 Suppl):S112-22. PubMed ID: 17440322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of sprayable fixatives on a sandy soil for potential use in a dirty bomb response.
    Fritz BG; Whitaker JD
    Health Phys; 2008 Jun; 94(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 18469584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Establishing remediation levels in response to a radiological dispersal event (or "dirty bomb").
    Elcock D; Klemic GA; Taboas AL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 May; 38(9):2505-12. PubMed ID: 15180044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How serious is threat of radiological terrorism?
    Kuna P; Hon Z; Patodka J
    Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2009; 52(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 20073419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Iodine prophylaxis to prevent radiation damage following nuclear disasters].
    Frankfort SV; Roos JC; Franssen EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Aug; 147(34):1641-4. PubMed ID: 12966630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The roles of medical health physicists in a medical radiation emergency.
    Miller CW; Whitcomb RC; Ansari A; McCurley C; Guinn A; Tucker F
    Health Phys; 2007 Nov; 93(5 Suppl):S187-90. PubMed ID: 18049249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of realistic RDD scenarios and their radiological consequence analyses.
    Shin H; Kim J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1516-20. PubMed ID: 19318261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of communication materials on public responses to a radiological dispersal device (RDD) attack.
    Rogers MB; Amlôt R; Rubin GJ
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Mar; 11(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 23510306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.