196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19700264)
1. Effectiveness of different substrate materials for in vitro sunscreen tests.
Garoli D; Pelizzo MG; Nicolosi P; Peserico A; Tonin E; Alaibac M
J Dermatol Sci; 2009 Nov; 56(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 19700264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sunscreen tests: correspondence between in vitro data and values reported by the manufacturers.
Garoli D; Pelizzo MG; Bernardini B; Nicolosi P; Alaibac M
J Dermatol Sci; 2008 Dec; 52(3):193-204. PubMed ID: 18755574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of different substrates for the in vitro determination of sunscreen photostability: spectrophotometric and HPLC analyses.
Scalia S; Mezzena M; Bianchi A
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2010 Feb; 32(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 19732185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How a calculated model of sunscreen film geometry can explain in vitro and in vivo SPF variation.
Ferrero L; Pissavini M; Doucet O
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2010 Apr; 9(4):540-51. PubMed ID: 20354649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photoprotective efficacy and photostability of fifteen sunscreen products having the same label SPF subjected to natural sunlight.
Hojerová J; Medovcíková A; Mikula M
Int J Pharm; 2011 Apr; 408(1-2):27-38. PubMed ID: 21277959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Importance of sunscreen products spreading protocol and substrate roughness for in vitro sun protection factor assessment.
Fageon L; Moyal D; Coutet J; Candau D
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2009 Dec; 31(6):405-18. PubMed ID: 19627381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternative evaluation method in vitro for the water-resistant effect of sunscreen products.
Ahn S; Yang H; Lee H; Moon S; Chang I
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 18412561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quartz plates for determining sun protection in vitro and testing photostability of commercial sunscreens.
Akrman J; Kubác L; Bendová H; Jírová D; Kejlová K
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2009 Apr; 31(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 19175432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro evaluation of sun protection factors of sunscreen agents using a novel UV spectrophotometric technique.
Bleasel MD; Aldous S
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Aug; 30(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 18713072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Porcine ear skin as a biological substrate for in vitro testing of sunscreen performance.
Sohn M; Korn V; Imanidis G
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2015; 28(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 25096635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro assessment of the broad-spectrum ultraviolet protection of sunscreen products.
Diffey BL; Tanner PR; Matts PJ; Nash JF
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Dec; 43(6):1024-35. PubMed ID: 11100018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addressing technical challenges associated with the FDA's proposed rules for the UVA in vitro testing procedure.
Dueva-Koganov OV; Rocafort C; Orofino S; Osterwalder U; Brito J
J Cosmet Sci; 2009; 60(6):587-98. PubMed ID: 20038348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface Structures of Cosmetic Standard Poly Methyl Methacrylate UV Evaluation Plates and their Influence on the in vitro Evaluation of UV Protection Abilities of Cosmetic Sunscreens.
Kuroda A; Sakai K; Yahagi S; Mukawa T; Sato N; Nakamura N; Maezawa D; Masaki H; Banno T; Asakura K
J Oleo Sci; 2019 Feb; 68(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 30651410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of application amount on sunscreen photodegradation in in vitro sun protection factor evaluation: proposal of a skin-mimicking substrate.
Miura Y; Hirao T; Hatao M
Photochem Photobiol; 2012; 88(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 22077193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of sun protection factors determined by an in vivo and different in vitro methodologies: a study with 58 different commercially available sunscreen products.
Heinrich U; Tronnier H; Kockott D; Kuckuk R; Heise HM
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2004 Apr; 26(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18494916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of sun protection factors by calculation of transmissions with a calibrated step film model.
Herzog B
J Cosmet Sci; 2002; 53(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 11917252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro approaches to evaluation of Sun Protection Factor.
Bendová H; Akrman J; Krejcí A; Kubác L; Jírová D; Kejlová K; Kolárová H; Brabec M; Malý M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Oct; 21(7):1268-75. PubMed ID: 17945463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new chemical approach to optimize the in vitro SPF method on the HD6 PMMA plate.
Marguerie S; Pissavini M; Baud A; Carayol T; Doucet O
J Cosmet Sci; 2012; 63(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 23193888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Problems of in vitro SPF measurements brought about by viscous fingering generated during sunscreen applications.
Fujikake K; Tago S; Plasson R; Nakazawa R; Okano K; Maezawa D; Mukawa T; Kuroda A; Asakura K
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2014; 27(5):254-62. PubMed ID: 24923467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency of a continuous height distribution model of sunscreen film geometry to predict a realistic sun protection factor.
Ferrero L; Pissavini M; Marguerie S; Zastrow L
J Cosmet Sci; 2003; 54(5):463-81. PubMed ID: 14605688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
