218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19700685)
61. Microbiological quality of milk from small processing units in Senegal.
Breurec S; Poueme R; Fall C; Tall A; Diawara A; Bada-Alambedji R; Broutin C; Leclercq A; Garin B
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2010 May; 7(5):601-4. PubMed ID: 20141346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Risk factors for milk off-flavours in dairy herds from Prince Edward Island, Canada.
Mounchili A; Wichtel JJ; Dohoo IR; Keefe GP; Halliday LJ
Prev Vet Med; 2004 Jul; 64(2-4):133-45. PubMed ID: 15325768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Microbiological and chemical quality of raw milk in New York State.
Boor KJ; Brown DP; Murphy SC; Kozlowski SM; Bandler DK
J Dairy Sci; 1998 Jun; 81(6):1743-8. PubMed ID: 9684182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Effect of extended storage on microbiological quality, somatic cell count, and composition of raw goat milk on a farm.
Zeng SS; Chen SS; Bah B; Tesfai K
J Food Prot; 2007 May; 70(5):1281-5. PubMed ID: 17536695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Selection of tests for monitoring the bacteriological quality of refrigerated raw milk supplies.
Senyk GF; Goodall C; Kozlowski SM; Bandler DK
J Dairy Sci; 1988 Mar; 71(3):613-9. PubMed ID: 3286697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. The effect of udder preparation before milking and contamination from the milking plant on bacterial numbers in bulk milk of eight dairy herds.
McKinnon CH; Rowlands GJ; Bramley AJ
J Dairy Res; 1990 Aug; 57(3):307-18. PubMed ID: 2401758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Evaluation of a GMP training of milkers in dairy goat farms in São Paulo, Brazil.
Tavolaro P; Oliveira CA
Int J Environ Health Res; 2006 Feb; 16(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 16507483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. No seasonal effect on culturable pseudomonads in fresh milks from cattle herds.
Leriche F; Fayolle K
J Dairy Sci; 2012 May; 95(5):2299-306. PubMed ID: 22541458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A decade of improvement: New York State fluid milk quality.
Martin NH; Carey NR; Murphy SC; Wiedmann M; Boor KJ
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Dec; 95(12):7384-90. PubMed ID: 23040014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Towards an optimum mixing protocol for on-farm bulk milk sampling.
Servello V; Hill AR; Lencki RW
J Dairy Sci; 2004 Sep; 87(9):2846-53. PubMed ID: 15375043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Effect of cleaning procedure and hygienic condition of milking equipment on bacterial count of bulk tank milk.
Bava L; Zucali M; Sandrucci A; Brasca M; Vanoni L; Zanini L; Tamburini A
J Dairy Res; 2011 May; 78(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 21371358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Influence of raw milk quality on processed dairy products: How do raw milk quality test results relate to product quality and yield?
Murphy SC; Martin NH; Barbano DM; Wiedmann M
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Dec; 99(12):10128-10149. PubMed ID: 27665134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Survey of the microbiological count of the milk collected from livestock ancient city of Garmsar, Semnan Province, Iran.
Hooshmand Z; Teymouri P; Safari M; Soleimani Z
Trop Anim Health Prod; 2020 Jan; 52(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 31332592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Bulk tank somatic cell count and associated microbial quality of milk from selected dairy cattle herds in Oyo State, Nigeria.
Olatoye O; Amosun A; Ogbu U; Okunlade Y
Ital J Food Saf; 2018 Jul; 7(2):7130. PubMed ID: 30046555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Short communication: Coliform Petrifilm as an alternative method for detecting total gram-negative bacteria in fluid milk.
Rojas A; Murphy SI; Wiedmann M; Martin NH
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5043-5046. PubMed ID: 32307175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Short communication: The effect of centrifugation and resuspension on the recovery of Mycoplasma species from milk.
Punyapornwithaya V; Fox LK; Gay GM; Hancock DD; Alldredge JR
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4444-7. PubMed ID: 19700705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Effect of leaving milk trucks empty and idle for 6 h between raw milk loads.
Kuhn E; Meunier-Goddik L; Waite-Cusic JG
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Feb; 101(2):1767-1776. PubMed ID: 29248213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Efficiency of two commercial on-farm pasteurizers for inactivation of mastitis pathogens in milk intended for feeding of calves.
Knappstein K; Aust V; Kunz HJ; Kaske M
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2013; 126(1-2):32-6. PubMed ID: 23367666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Limitations of on-site dairy farm regulatory debits as milk quality predictors.
Borneman DL; Stiegert K; Ingham S
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1526-38. PubMed ID: 25597965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Microbiological quality of pasteurized milk on expiration date in Tehran, Iran.
Koushki M; Koohy-Kamaly P; Azizkhani M; Hadinia N
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1796-1801. PubMed ID: 26774719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
