278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19701088)
21. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments, inverse fast Fourier transforms, and SFOAEs in impaired ears.
Konrad-Martin D; Neely ST; Keefe DH; Dorn PA; Cyr E; Gorga MP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1800-9. PubMed ID: 12002864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
Sutton LA; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Whitehead ML
Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
Whitehead ML; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Weighted DPOAE input/output-functions: a tool for automatic assessment of hearing loss in clinical application.
Oswald JA; Janssen T
Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 12868334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
Nieschalk M; Hustert B; Stoll W
Audiology; 1998; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss in humans: comparison of unequal- and equal-level stimuli.
Sun XM; Jung MD; Kim DO; Randolph KJ
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1996 Dec; 105(12):982-90. PubMed ID: 8973286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Audiometric predictions using stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and middle ear measurements.
Ellison JC; Keefe DH
Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):487-503. PubMed ID: 16230898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stimulus ratio dependence of low-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
Christensen AT; Ordoñez R; Hammershøi D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):679-89. PubMed ID: 25698003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Input-output functions of the nonlinear-distortion component of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired human ears.
Zelle D; Lorenz L; Thiericke JP; Gummer AW; Dalhoff E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3203. PubMed ID: 28599560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimation of Minor Conductive Hearing Loss in Humans Using Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
Marcrum SC; Kummer P; Steffens T
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):391-398. PubMed ID: 28169838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
Hauser R; Probst R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability in a Patient Population.
Dreisbach L; Zettner E; Chang Liu M; Meuel Fernhoff C; MacPhee I; Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28678077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Distortion product otoacoustic emission response characteristics in older adults.
Torre P; Cruickshanks KJ; Nondahl DM; Wiley TL
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 12598810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical relevance of distortion product emissions by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Steinhart HU; Bohlender JE; Benttzien S; Hoppe U
Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 11683451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.
Kummer P; Janssen T; Arnold W
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3431-44. PubMed ID: 9637030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
