BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19702371)

  • 1. Fitting measurement models to vocational interest data: are dominance models ideal?
    Tay L; Drasgow F; Rounds J; Williams BA
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Sep; 94(5):1287-304. PubMed ID: 19702371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. People--things and data--ideas: bipolar dimensions?
    Tay L; Su R; Rounds J
    J Couns Psychol; 2011 Jul; 58(3):424-40. PubMed ID: 21639616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?
    Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F; Williams BA
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 16435936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures.
    Chernyshenko OS; Stark S; Drasgow F; Roberts BW
    Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):88-106. PubMed ID: 17371125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Holland in Iceland revisited: an emic approach to evaluating U.S. vocational interest models.
    Einarsdóttir S; Rounds J; Su R
    J Couns Psychol; 2010 Jul; 57(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 21133585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bookmark locations and item response model selection in the presence of local item dependence.
    Skaggs G
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 17215566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling.
    Meijer RR; Baneke JJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):354-68. PubMed ID: 15355153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new class of parametric IRT models for dichotomous item scores.
    Hessen DJ
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(4):385-97. PubMed ID: 15496746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models.
    Smith RM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):199-218. PubMed ID: 12029178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Negative affectivity and social inhibition in cardiovascular disease: evaluating type-D personality and its assessment using item response theory.
    Emons WH; Meijer RR; Denollet J
    J Psychosom Res; 2007 Jul; 63(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 17586335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review.
    Thomas ML
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 20644081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ramsay-curve item response theory (RC-IRT) to detect and correct for nonnormal latent variables.
    Woods CM
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):253-70. PubMed ID: 16953704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matches Made With Information: Fitting Measurement Models to Adult Attachment Data.
    Sun T; Fraley RC; Drasgow F
    Assessment; 2021 Oct; 28(7):1828-1847. PubMed ID: 33185133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating latent constructs with item response models: a MATLAB IRTm toolbox.
    Braeken J; Tuerlinckx F
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1127-37. PubMed ID: 19897820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parameter recovery for the rating scale model using PARSCALE.
    French GA; Dodd BG
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(2):176-99. PubMed ID: 10204326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the Process of Responding to Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values Items: Should Ideal Point Scoring Methods Be Considered?
    Ling Y; Zhang M; Locke KD; Li G; Li Z
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 26421444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a new critical thinking test using item response theory.
    Wagner TA; Harvey RJ
    Psychol Assess; 2006 Mar; 18(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 16594818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.