These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19702471)

  • 1. Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.
    Kuperberg GR; Choi A; Cohn N; Paczynski M; Jackendoff R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2685-701. PubMed ID: 19702471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The processing of animacy in noun-classifier combinations in reading Korean: An ERP study.
    Jin L
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Oct; 126():23-32. PubMed ID: 30098583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural dynamics of animacy processing in language comprehension: ERP evidence from the interpretation of classifier-noun combinations.
    Zhang Y; Zhang J; Min B
    Brain Lang; 2012 Mar; 120(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 22099971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences.
    Weckerly J; Kutas M
    Psychophysiology; 1999 Sep; 36(5):559-70. PubMed ID: 10442024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Local and global semantic integration in an argument structure: ERP evidence from Korean.
    Nam Y; Hong U
    Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 1642():590-602. PubMed ID: 27095512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech and span: working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension.
    Nakano H; Saron C; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2886-98. PubMed ID: 19929760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No semantic illusions in the "Semantic P600" phenomenon: ERP evidence from Mandarin Chinese.
    Chow WY; Phillips C
    Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1506():76-93. PubMed ID: 23422676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.
    Szewczyk JM; Schriefers H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1368():208-21. PubMed ID: 21029726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography.
    Service E; Helenius P; Maury S; Salmelin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1193-205. PubMed ID: 17583994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.
    Kuperberg GR; Brothers T; Wlotko EW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 32(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 31479347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple constraints on semantic integration in a hierarchical structure: ERP evidence from German.
    Zhang Y; Jiang X; Saalbach H; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1410():89-100. PubMed ID: 21803335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.
    Kuperberg GR; Sitnikova T; Caplan D; Holcomb PJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jun; 17(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 12763198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-examination of Chinese semantic processing and syntactic processing: evidence from conventional ERPs and reconstructed ERPs by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE).
    Wang F; Ouyang G; Zhou C; Wang S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0117324. PubMed ID: 25615600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple Influences of Semantic Memory on Sentence Processing: Distinct Effects of Semantic Relatedness on Violations of Real-World Event/State Knowledge and Animacy Selection Restrictions.
    Paczynski M; Kuperberg GR
    J Mem Lang; 2012 Nov; 67(4):426-448. PubMed ID: 23284226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Kuperberg GR; Kreher DA; Sitnikova T; Caplan DN; Holcomb PJ
    Brain Lang; 2007 Mar; 100(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 16546247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple semantic processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy: does the higher-level process proceed in face of a lower-level failure?
    Jiang X; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1918-28. PubMed ID: 22561886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations.
    DeLong KA; Urbach TP; Groppe DM; Kutas M
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1203-7. PubMed ID: 21457275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.