These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19702705)

  • 1. Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry.
    Landers J; Goggin M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 37(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 19702705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes: IOLMaster® versus immersion ultrasound.
    Whang WJ; Jung BJ; Oh TH; Byun YS; Joo CK
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2012; 43(6):496-9. PubMed ID: 22869383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II.
    Kiss B; Findl O; Menapace R; Wirtitsch M; Petternel V; Drexler W; Rainer G; Georgopoulos M; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Feb; 28(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 11821201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.
    Hsieh YT; Wang IJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23147857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens position, and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
    Engren AL; Behndig A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(4):572-7. PubMed ID: 23395354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry.
    Aristodemou P; Knox Cartwright NE; Sparrow JM; Johnston RL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jan; 37(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 21183100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing ultrasound biometry with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculations: a randomized study.
    Raymond S; Favilla I; Santamaria L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2547-52. PubMed ID: 19168907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysis.
    Packer M; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Coffman PG; Brown LK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Feb; 28(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 11821203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keratometry obtained by corneal mapping versus the IOLMaster in the prediction of postoperative refraction in routine cataract surgery.
    Dulku S; Smith HB; Antcliff RJ
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013; 41(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 22594695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using partial coherence interferometry in patients with high myopia.
    Roessler GF; Dietlein TS; Plange N; Roepke AK; Dinslage S; Walter P; Mazinani BA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 22512374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases.
    Eleftheriadis H
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Aug; 87(8):960-3. PubMed ID: 12881334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry.
    Bhatt AB; Schefler AC; Feuer WJ; Yoo SH; Murray TG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Jul; 126(7):929-33. PubMed ID: 18625938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry in high myopic patients with cataract].
    Yang Q; Chen B; Peng G; Li Z; Huang Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 50(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 24709131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular Lens Power Selection after Radial Keratotomy: Topography, Manual, and IOLMaster Keratometry Results Using Haigis Formulas.
    Geggel HS
    Ophthalmology; 2015 May; 122(5):897-902. PubMed ID: 25601534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Rajan MS; Keilhorn I; Bell JA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Sep; 16(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 12194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation.
    Rose LT; Moshegov CN
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 12648044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-scan.
    Moon SW; Lim SH; Lee HY
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):444-50. PubMed ID: 25435746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Immersion Ultrasound Biometry.
    Turhan SA; Toker E
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jul; 41(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 26114979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Refractive outcomes after silicone oil removal and intraocular lens implantation.
    Suk KK; Smiddy WE; Shi W
    Retina; 2013 Mar; 33(3):634-41. PubMed ID: 23190922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.