These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19702705)
21. Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery: Scheimpflug keratometry versus standard automated keratometry in virgin corneas. Lam S; Gupta BK; Hahn JM; Manastersky NA J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1984-7. PubMed ID: 21889873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Value of dual biometry in the detection and investigation of error in the preoperative prediction of refractive status following cataract surgery. Charalampidou S; Dooley I; Molloy L; Beatty S Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 20447121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMaster. Freeman G; Pesudovs K Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Aug; 83(4):439-42. PubMed ID: 16029267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of refractive outcome using intraoperative biometry and partial coherence interferometry in silicone oil-filled eyes. El-Baha SM; Hemeida TS Retina; 2009 Jan; 29(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18695632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimization of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the Zeiss IOLMaster. Madge SN; Khong CH; Lamont M; Bansal A; Antcliff RJ Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Aug; 83(4):436-8. PubMed ID: 16029266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimization of biometry for intraocular lens implantation using the Zeiss IOLMaster. Madge SN; Khong CH; Lamont M; Bansal A; Antcliff RJ Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Oct; 83(5):436-8. PubMed ID: 16187984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lack of statistical power and refractive outcomes. Aristodemou P; Cartwright NK; Johnston R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6892-3. PubMed ID: 21123775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas. Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Drexler W; Findl O; Menapace R; Rainer G; Vass C; Hitzenberger CK; Fercher AF Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Oct; 126(4):524-34. PubMed ID: 9780097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry in terms of target postoperative refraction]. Hrebcová J; Skorkovská S; Vasků A Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jul; 65(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 19750832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improving refractive outcomes at extreme axial lengths with the IOLMaster: the optical axial length and keratometric transformation. Fam HB; Lim KL Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 19168467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of axial length, anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens power between IOLMaster and ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes. Dong J; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Jia Z; Zhang S; Wang X PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194273. PubMed ID: 29543854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of Gas Tamponade on the Intraocular Lens Position and Refractive Error after Phacovitrectomy: A Swept-Source Anterior Segment OCT Analysis. Shiraki N; Wakabayashi T; Sakaguchi H; Nishida K Ophthalmology; 2020 Apr; 127(4):511-515. PubMed ID: 31767435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Partial coherent interferometry--an alternative method for intraocular lens power calculation performed by ultrasonography]. Wylegała E; Ludyga A Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 15515318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Gender differences in biometry prediction error and intra-ocular lens power calculation formula. Behndig A; Montan P; Lundström M; Zetterström C; Kugelberg M Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):759-63. PubMed ID: 24930806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery of intraocular lens constant personalization using the Haigis formula. Charalampidou S; Cassidy L; Ng E; Loughman J; Nolan J; Stack J; Beatty S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1081-9. PubMed ID: 20610083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The importance of biometry to cataract outcomes in a surgical unit in Africa. Briesen S; Roberts H; Lewallen S Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 17(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 20642341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry. Jasvinder S; Khang TF; Sarinder KK; Loo VP; Subrayan V Eye (Lond); 2011 Jun; 25(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 21394115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interocular Axial Length and Corneal Power Differences as Predictors of Postoperative Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery. Kansal V; Schlenker M; Ahmed IIK Ophthalmology; 2018 Jul; 125(7):972-981. PubMed ID: 29459040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preoperative measurements for cataract surgery: a comparison of ultrasound and optical biometric devices. Pereira A; Popovic M; Lloyd JC; El-Defrawy S; Schlenker MB Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 41(4):1521-1530. PubMed ID: 33511513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]