These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19703083)

  • 1. A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length.
    Vahid A; Roohi N; Zayeri F
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 19703083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison.
    Kuzekanani M; Walsh LJ; Yousefi MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 19884706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
    Özer SY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
    Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
    J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
    Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Bürklein S; Hiller C; Huda M; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 21276014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of canal transportation and changes in canal curvature of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    El Batouty KM; Elmallah WE
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1290-2. PubMed ID: 21846551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.