These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19703870)

  • 1. Important imaging finding e-mail alert system: experience after 3 years of implementation.
    Abujudeh HH; Kaewlai R; Choy G; Whelton DG; Rosenthal DI
    Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):747-53. PubMed ID: 19703870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. E-mail alert system enables communication of important but nonurgent radiologic findings.
    Maes RM; Abujudeh H; Kaewlai R
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):991; author reply 991-2. PubMed ID: 20177113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic messaging system for communicating important, but nonemergent, abnormal imaging results.
    Eisenberg RL; Yamada K; Yam CS; Spirn PW; Kruskal JB
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):724-31. PubMed ID: 20884911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. E-mail alert for important imaging findings.
    Hall FM
    Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):635; author reply 635-6. PubMed ID: 20093538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiology reporting: attitudes of referring physicians.
    Clinger NJ; Hunter TB; Hillman BJ
    Radiology; 1988 Dec; 169(3):825-6. PubMed ID: 3187005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communication of unexpected and significant findings on chest radiographs with an automated PACS alert system.
    Hayes SA; Breen M; McLaughlin PD; Murphy KP; Henry MT; Maher MM; Ryan MF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Aug; 11(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 24818987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A picture is worth a thousand words: needs assessment for multimedia radiology reports in a large tertiary care medical center.
    Nayak L; Beaulieu CF; Rubin DL; Lipson JA
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1577-83. PubMed ID: 24200485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When does a radiologist's recommendation for follow-up result in high-cost imaging?
    Lee SI; Krishnaraj A; Chatterji M; Dreyer KJ; Thrall JH; Hahn PF
    Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):544-9. PubMed ID: 22084210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency of radiology self-referral in abdominal computed tomographic scans and the implied cost.
    Blaivas M; Lyon M
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 May; 25(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 17499656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patients Prefer Results From the Ordering Provider and Access to Their Radiology Reports.
    Cabarrus M; Naeger DM; Rybkin A; Qayyum A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jun; 12(6):556-62. PubMed ID: 25892226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety-Net Academic Hospital Experience in Following Up Noncritical Yet Potentially Significant Radiologist Recommendations.
    Kadom N; Doherty G; Solomon A; Close M; Friedman S; Gregson D; Rostad BS; Moses JM; Norbash A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):982-986. PubMed ID: 28777651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focal cystic pancreatic lesions: assessing variation in radiologists' management recommendations.
    Ip IK; Mortele KJ; Prevedello LM; Khorasani R
    Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 21292867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing.
    Seltzer SE; Kelly P; Adams DF; Chiango BF; Viera MA; Fener E; Rondeau R; Kazanjian N; Laffel G; Shaffer K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 8140990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Four-year impact of an alert notification system on closed-loop communication of critical test results.
    Lacson R; Prevedello LM; Andriole KP; O'Connor SD; Roy C; Gandhi T; Dalal AK; Sato L; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 25341129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making preliminary radiographic reports available to referring clinicians: current status.
    Cohen MD
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 18078916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiology by nonradiologists: is report documentation adequate?
    Weiner SN
    Am J Manag Care; 2005 Dec; 11(12):781-5. PubMed ID: 16336062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Addenda to the radiology report: what are we trying to convey?
    Hussain S; Allende MB; Karam AR; Hussain JS; Vijayaraghavan G
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Oct; 8(10):703-5. PubMed ID: 21962784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of Certified EHR, Patient Portal, and "Direct" Messaging Technology in a Radiology Environment Enhances Communication of Radiology Results to Both Referring Physicians and Patients.
    Reicher JJ; Reicher MA
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Jun; 29(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 26588906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department.
    Cavagna E; Berletti R; Schiavon F; Scarsi B; Barbato G
    Radiol Med; 2003 Mar; 105(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 12835644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structured feedback from referring physicians: a novel approach to quality improvement in radiology reporting.
    Gunn AJ; Alabre CI; Bennett SE; Kautzky M; Krakower T; Palamara K; Choy G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):853-7. PubMed ID: 24059375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.