These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19703870)

  • 21. A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message.
    White CB; Moyer CA; Stern DT; Katz SJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 15064295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using informatics-enabled quality improvement techniques to meet health record documentation requirements in radiology reports.
    Prevedello LM; Farkas C; Dufault A; Damiano M; Doubilet P; Khorasani R
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):1032-6. PubMed ID: 23830609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical e-mail in an academic dermatology setting.
    Kia KF; Tavakkoli A; Ellis CN
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jun; 54(6):1019-24. PubMed ID: 16713456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
    Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Natural language processing using online analytic processing for assessing recommendations in radiology reports.
    Dang PA; Kalra MK; Blake MA; Schultz TJ; Stout M; Lemay PR; Freshman DJ; Halpern EF; Dreyer KJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 18312968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and validation of a scale to assess attitudes of health care administrators toward the use of e-mail communication between patients and physicians.
    Bhor M; Mason HL
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Dec; 2(4):512-32. PubMed ID: 17161809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports in a teaching hospital setting.
    Seltzer SE; Kelly P; Adams DF; Chiango BF; Viera MA; Fener E; Hooton S; Bannon-Rohrbach S; Healy CD; Doubilet PM; Holman BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):889-93. PubMed ID: 9124134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Email notification combined with off site signing substantially reduces resident approval to faculty verification time.
    Deitte LA; Moser PP; Geller BS; Sistrom CL
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 21371914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does radiologist recommendation for follow-up with the same imaging modality contribute substantially to high-cost imaging volume?
    Lee SI; Saokar A; Dreyer KJ; Weilburg JB; Thrall JH; Hahn PF
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):857-64. PubMed ID: 17325070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of a 4-year quality improvement initiative to improve communication of critical imaging test results.
    Anthony SG; Prevedello LM; Damiano MM; Gandhi TK; Doubilet PM; Seltzer SE; Khorasani R
    Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):802-7. PubMed ID: 21467253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports.
    Holman BL; Aliabadi P; Silverman SG; Weissman BN; Rudolph LE; Fener EF
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):519-21. PubMed ID: 8153332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Congenital portosystemic shunts: imaging findings and clinical presentations in 11 patients.
    Konstas AA; Digumarthy SR; Avery LL; Wallace KL; Lisovsky M; Misdraji J; Hahn PF
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 20106622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content.
    Naik SS; Hanbidge A; Wilson SR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):591-8. PubMed ID: 11222186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective.
    Grieve FM; Plumb AA; Khan SH
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 83(985):17-22. PubMed ID: 19470574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The disproportionate effects of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on radiologists' private office MRI and CT practices compared with those of other physicians.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 19720356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experiences of physicians who frequently use e-mail with patients.
    Houston TK; Sands DZ; Nash BR; Ford DE
    Health Commun; 2003; 15(4):515-25. PubMed ID: 14527870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does integrating nonurgent, clinically significant radiology alerts within the electronic health record impact closed-loop communication and follow-up?
    O'Connor SD; Dalal AK; Sahni VA; Lacson R; Khorasani R
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Mar; 23(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 26335982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Error rates in breast imaging reports: comparison of automatic speech recognition and dictation transcription.
    Basma S; Lord B; Jacks LM; Rizk M; Scaranelo AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):923-7. PubMed ID: 21940580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Referrer satisfaction as a quality criterion: developing an questionnaire for measuring the quality of services provided by a radiology department].
    Kubik-Huch RA; Rexroth M; Porst R; Dürselen L; Otto R; Szucs T
    Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 15719307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.