560 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19704093)
1. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation.
Dewey M; Zimmermann E; Deissenrieder F; Laule M; Dübel HP; Schlattmann P; Knebel F; Rutsch W; Hamm B
Circulation; 2009 Sep; 120(10):867-75. PubMed ID: 19704093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Pelliccia F; Pasceri V; Evangelista A; Pergolini A; Barillà F; Viceconte N; Tanzilli G; Schiariti M; Greco C; Gaudio C
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):443-52. PubMed ID: 22806317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison.
Yin WH; Lu B; Li N; Han L; Hou ZH; Wu RZ; Wu YJ; Niu HX; Jiang SL; Krazinski AW; Ebersberger U; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1239-49. PubMed ID: 24269265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of SSF on Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Within 1 Heart Beat in Patients With High Heart Rate Using a 256-Row Detector Computed Tomography.
Liang J; Wang H; Xu L; Dong L; Fan Z; Wang R; Sun Z
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 28708724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can we perform coronary artery bypass grafting on the basis of computed tomographic angiography alone? A comparison with conventional coronary angiography.
Bedi HS; Gill JA; Bakshi SS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 33(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 18243721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
Dewey M; Teige F; Schnapauff D; Laule M; Borges AC; Wernecke KD; Schink T; Baumann G; Rutsch W; Rogalla P; Taupitz M; Hamm B
Ann Intern Med; 2006 Sep; 145(6):407-15. PubMed ID: 16983128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography.
Herzog C; Zwerner PL; Doll JR; Nielsen CD; Nguyen SA; Savino G; Vogl TJ; Costello P; Schoepf UJ
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 17581898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-detector cardiac computed tomography compared with stress nuclear imaging in patients undergoing invasive cardiac catheterization.
Hamirani YS; Isma'eel H; Larijani V; Drury P; Lim W; Bevinal M; Saeed A; Ahmadi N; Karlsberg RP; Budoff MJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):645-51. PubMed ID: 20861764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation dose in coronary artery angiography with 320-detector row CT and its diagnostic accuracy: comparison with 64-detector row CT.
Zhang T; Luo Z; Wang D; Han D; Bai J; Meng X; Shen B
Minerva Med; 2011 Aug; 102(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 21959699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography.
Herzog BA; Wyss CA; Husmann L; Gaemperli O; Valenta I; Treyer V; Landmesser U; Kaufmann PA
Heart; 2009 Oct; 95(20):1656-61. PubMed ID: 19581273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT coronary angiography using 16 and 64 simultaneous detector rows: intraindividual comparison.
Dewey M; Hoffmann H; Hamm B
Rofo; 2007 Jun; 179(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 17492543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive value of zero calcium score and low-end percentiles for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Vogler N; Meyer M; Fink C; Schoepf UJ; Schönberg SO; Henzler T
Rofo; 2013 Aug; 185(8):726-32. PubMed ID: 23900940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Cury RC; Magalhães TA; Borges AC; Shiozaki AA; Lemos PA; Júnior JS; Meneghetti JC; Cury RC; Rochitte CE
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 20643238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of 128-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis.
Chaosuwannakit N; Kiatchoosakun S; Makarawate P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Dec; 95(12):1548-55. PubMed ID: 23390786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography.
Schlosser T; Konorza T; Hunold P; Kühl H; Schmermund A; Barkhausen J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 44(6):1224-9. PubMed ID: 15364323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preserved diagnostic performance of dual-source CT coronary angiography with reduced radiation exposure and cancer risk.
Weustink AC; Mollet NR; Neefjes LA; van Straten M; Neoh E; Kyrzopoulos S; Meijboom BW; van Mieghem C; Cademartiri F; de Feyter PJ; Krestin GP
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 19451542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.
Hirai N; Horiguchi J; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Matsuura N; Kitagawa T; Teragawa H; Kohno N; Ito K
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 18574140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective study for comparison of MR and CT imaging for detection of coronary artery stenosis.
Hamdan A; Asbach P; Wellnhofer E; Klein C; Gebker R; Kelle S; Kilian H; Huppertz A; Fleck E
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jan; 4(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 21232704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography.
Rief M; Zimmermann E; Stenzel F; Martus P; Stangl K; Greupner J; Knebel F; Kranz A; Schlattmann P; Laule M; Dewey M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1476-85. PubMed ID: 23792193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate.
Carrascosa P; Capuñay C; Deviggiano A; Goldsmit A; Tajer C; Bettinotti M; Carrascosa J; Ivanc TB; Fallahi A; García MJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 20444666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
