These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19705484)

  • 1. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust.
    Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():173-80. PubMed ID: 19705484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.
    Benkert P; Schwede T; Tosatto SC
    BMC Struct Biol; 2009 May; 9():35. PubMed ID: 19457232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP8 using the ModFOLD server.
    McGuffin LJ
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():185-90. PubMed ID: 19585661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Larsson P; Skwark MJ; Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():167-72. PubMed ID: 19544566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of global and local quality of CASP8 models by MULTICOM series.
    Cheng J; Wang Z; Tegge AN; Eickholt J
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():181-4. PubMed ID: 19544564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment.
    Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schomburg D
    Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):261-77. PubMed ID: 17932912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():184-93. PubMed ID: 17894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of automatic tools and human expertise in template-based modeling of CASP8 target proteins.
    Venclovas C; Margelevicius M
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():81-8. PubMed ID: 19639635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation.
    Benkert P; Künzli M; Schwede T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jul; 37(Web Server issue):W510-4. PubMed ID: 19429685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protein-binding site prediction based on three-dimensional protein modeling.
    Oh M; Joo K; Lee J
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():152-6. PubMed ID: 19768678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred.
    Hildebrand A; Remmert M; Biegert A; Söding J
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():128-32. PubMed ID: 19626712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8.
    Ezkurdia I; Graña O; Izarzugaza JM; Tress ML
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():196-209. PubMed ID: 19714769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold recognition scores.
    Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4248-54. PubMed ID: 16204344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions.
    Feig M; Brooks CL
    Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 12211003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models.
    Karplus K; Karchin R; Shackelford G; Hughey R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4107-15. PubMed ID: 16123115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of CASP8 structure predictions for template free targets.
    Ben-David M; Noivirt-Brik O; Paz A; Prilusky J; Sussman JL; Levy Y
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():50-65. PubMed ID: 19774550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved profile HMM performance by assessment of critical algorithmic features in SAM and HMMER.
    Wistrand M; Sonnhammer EL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():99. PubMed ID: 15831105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid model quality assessment for protein structure predictions using the comparison of multiple models without structural alignments.
    McGuffin LJ; Roche DB
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 19897565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein-ligand interactions.
    Paul N; Rognan D
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 12001231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition.
    Lensink MF; Méndez R; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):704-18. PubMed ID: 17918726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.