These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19705929)
1. Force decay of elastomeric ligatures: influence on unloading force compared to self-ligation. Petersen A; Rosenstein S; Kim KB; Israel H Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):934-8. PubMed ID: 19705929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance. Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forces released during alignment with a preadjusted appliance with different types of elastomeric ligatures. Franchi L; Baccetti T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):687-90. PubMed ID: 16679210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets. Cordasco G; Farronato G; Festa F; Nucera R; Parazzoli E; Grossi GB Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro frictional forces generated by three different ligation methods. Gandini P; Orsi L; Bertoncini C; Massironi S; Franchi L Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):917-21. PubMed ID: 18298218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets. Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frictional resistance in plastic preadjusted brackets ligated with low-friction and conventional elastomeric ligatures. Ioi H; Yanase Y; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL J Orthod; 2009 Mar; 36(1):17-22; discussion 13. PubMed ID: 19286872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forces released during sliding mechanics with passive self-ligating brackets or nonconventional elastomeric ligatures. Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Barbato E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 18174077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys. Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of ligation on the load deflection characteristics of nickel titanium orthodontic wire. Kasuya S; Nagasaka S; Hanyuda A; Ishimura S; Hirashita A Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 17873145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Friction between archwires of different sizes, cross-section and alloy and brackets ligated with low-friction or conventional ligatures. Tecco S; Tetè S; Festa F Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19123711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment. Tecco S; D'Attilio M; Tetè S; Festa F Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 19465738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Friction produced by types of elastomeric ligatures in treatment mechanics with the preadjusted appliance. Baccetti T; Franchi L Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 16539544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Henao SP; Kusy RP Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15132446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets. Elayyan F; Silikas N; Bearn D Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 20152677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections. Pandis N; Eliades T; Partowi S; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):738-42. PubMed ID: 18456148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An experimental study on the forces released by ceramic preadjusted brackets with low friction vs. conventional elastomeric ligatures. Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(2):294-9. PubMed ID: 18030375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary arch changes during leveling and aligning with fixed appliances and low-friction ligatures. Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Lupoli M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 16849077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frictional evaluations of dental typodont models using four self-ligating designs and a conventional design. Henao SP; Kusy RP Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15747819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model. Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]