These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19705929)
21. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules. Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations. Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of different ligation methods on friction. Hain M; Dhopatkar A; Rock P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):666-70. PubMed ID: 17110266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets. Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Eliades T; Jäger A; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces. Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Orthodontic treatment with preadjusted appliances and low-friction ligatures: experimental evidence and clinical observations. Baccetti T; Franchi L; Fortini A World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18426099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Forces released by esthetic preadjusted appliances with low-friction and conventional elastomeric ligatures. Camporesi M; Baccetti T; Franchi L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):772-5. PubMed ID: 17561057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires. Kahlon S; Rinchuse D; Robison JM; Close JM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 20620835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations. Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Static frictional resistance with the slide low-friction elastomeric ligature system. Jones SP; Ben Bihi S Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 20043548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of ligation on frictional resistance to sliding during repeated displacement. Sirisaowaluk N; Kravchuk O; Ho CT Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 17203578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets. Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems. Paduano S; Cioffi I; Iodice G; Rapuano A; Silva R Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19350061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Alleviation of mandibular anterior crowding with copper-nickel-titanium vs nickel-titanium wires: a double-blind randomized control trial. Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):152.e1-7;discussion 152-3. PubMed ID: 19651336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Friction of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with different dimensions. Chimenti C; Franchi L; Di Giuseppe MG; Lucci M Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):421-5. PubMed ID: 15898384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Force-deflection properties of initial orthodontic archwires. Quintão CC; Cal-Neto JP; Menezes LM; Elias CN World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 19388430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A "typodont" study of rate of orthodontic space closure: self-ligating systems vs. conventional systems. Saporito I; Butti AC; Salvato A; Biagi R Minerva Stomatol; 2011; 60(11-12):555-65. PubMed ID: 22210459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of frictional forces during the initial leveling stage in various combinations of self-ligating brackets and archwires with a custom-designed typodont system. Kim TK; Kim KD; Baek SH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):187.e15-24. PubMed ID: 18249279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance. Khambay B; Millett D; McHugh S Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 15947232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]