244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19705954)
1. Forces and moments generated with various incisor intrusion systems on maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):928-33. PubMed ID: 19705954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forces and moments on posterior teeth generated by incisor intrusion biomechanics.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov; 12(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19840283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated with various maxillary incisor intrusion biomechanics.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Apr; 32(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 19805394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative assessment of forces generated during simulated alignment with self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Pandis N; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 19349418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-couple orthodontic appliance systems utility arches: a two-couple intrusion arch.
Davidovitch M; Rebellato J
Semin Orthod; 1995 Mar; 1(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8935040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 22573909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moments generated during simulated rotational correction with self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Pandis N; Eliades T; Partowi S; Bourauel C
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1030-4. PubMed ID: 18947286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of forces and moments around the maxillary arch for treatment of a simulated lingual incisor and high canine malocclusion using straight and mushroom archwires in fixed lingual appliances.
Owen B; Gullion G; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW; Romanyk DL
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Nov; 39(6):665-672. PubMed ID: 28430887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-couple orthodontic appliance systems: torquing arches.
Isaacson RJ; Rebellato J
Semin Orthod; 1995 Mar; 1(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8935041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrusion mechanics according to Burstone with the NiTi-SE-steel uprighting spring.
Sander FG; Wichelhaus A; Schiemann C
J Orofac Orthop; 1996 Aug; 57(4):210-23. PubMed ID: 8765797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets.
Morina E; Eliades T; Pandis N; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 18540011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of mandibular incisor intrusion obtained using a conventional utility arch vs bone anchorage.
Aydoğdu E; Özsoy ÖP
Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):767-75. PubMed ID: 21469970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative assessment of forces and moments generated by lingual and conventional brackets.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Katsaros C; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 21464153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Anterior tooth intrusion with the base arch: preactivation by tip-back bending or curvature?].
Bantleon HP; Weiland FJ; Droschl H
Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1991 Jun; 52(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 1894244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Torque expression of 0.018 and 0.022 inch conventional brackets.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Oct; 35(5):610-4. PubMed ID: 22828075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections.
Pandis N; Eliades T; Partowi S; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):738-42. PubMed ID: 18456148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional methods of simultaneous intrusion and retraction of maxillary anterior: a finite element analysis.
Ahuja S; Gupta S; Bhambri E; Ahuja V; Jaura BS
J Orthod; 2018 Dec; 45(4):243-249. PubMed ID: 30280645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
