These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19706358)

  • 1. Variation of protein binding cavity volume and ligand volume in protein-ligand complexes.
    Saranya N; Selvaraj S
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2009 Oct; 19(19):5769-72. PubMed ID: 19706358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
    Brewerton SC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    Muegge I; Martin YC
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple method to calculate the accessible volume of protein-bound ligands: application for ligand selectivity.
    Hodneland E; Teigen K
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Sep; 26(2):429-33. PubMed ID: 17376721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of protein binding cavity volume (PCV) and ligand volume (LV) in rigid and flexible docking of protein-ligand complexes.
    Saranya N; Jeyakanthan J; Selvaraj S
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2012 Dec; 22(24):7593-7. PubMed ID: 23107480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computer drug design based on analysis of a target macromolecule structure. I. Search and description of a ligand binding site in a target molecule].
    Ivanov AS; Dubanov AV; Skvortsov VS; Archakov AI
    Vopr Med Khim; 2002; 48(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 12243090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PDBLIG: classification of small molecular protein binding in the Protein Data Bank.
    Chalk AJ; Worth CL; Overington JP; Chan AW
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jul; 47(15):3807-16. PubMed ID: 15239659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive docking study on the selectivity of binding of aromatic compounds to proteins.
    Hetényi C; Maran U; Karelson M
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1576-83. PubMed ID: 14502492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fully automated molecular mechanics based induced fit protein-ligand docking method.
    Koska J; Spassov VZ; Maynard AJ; Yan L; Austin N; Flook PK; Venkatachalam CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1965-73. PubMed ID: 18816046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Receptor flexibility in de novo ligand design and docking.
    Alberts IL; Todorov NP; Dean PM
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(21):6585-96. PubMed ID: 16220975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic analysis of the effect of small-molecule binding on protein flexibility of the ligand-binding sites.
    Yang CY; Wang R; Wang S
    J Med Chem; 2005 Sep; 48(18):5648-50. PubMed ID: 16134931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information theory-based scoring function for the structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Kulharia M; Goody RS; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1990-8. PubMed ID: 18767831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A searchable database for comparing protein-ligand binding sites for the analysis of structure-function relationships.
    Gold ND; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):736-42. PubMed ID: 16563004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LigEvolutioner, a new strategy for modification and optimization of lead compounds in receptor/ligand complexes.
    Zhou P; Tian F; Shang Z
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Dec; 72(6):525-32. PubMed ID: 19090919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein-ligand docking against non-native protein conformers.
    Verdonk ML; Mortenson PN; Hall RJ; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2214-25. PubMed ID: 18954138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ligand-protein docking with water molecules.
    Roberts BC; Mancera RL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 18211049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
    Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binding response: a descriptor for selecting ligand binding site on protein surfaces.
    Zhong S; MacKerell AD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2303-15. PubMed ID: 17900106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. sc-PDB: an annotated database of druggable binding sites from the Protein Data Bank.
    Kellenberger E; Muller P; Schalon C; Bret G; Foata N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):717-27. PubMed ID: 16563002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.