These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19706869)

  • 1. Re-reviewing peer review.
    Yaffe MB
    Sci Signal; 2009 Aug; 2(85):eg11. PubMed ID: 19706869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Receiving feedback from reviewers: how to make the most of criticism.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(4):148-50. PubMed ID: 10786470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Journal reviewing: is it in need of reform?
    Paniagua H
    Br J Nurs; 2003 Jul 24-Aug 13; 12(14):836; author reply 836. PubMed ID: 12959077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Talking back to reviewers: the gentle art of resubmission.
    O'Connell KA
    J Prof Nurs; 2001; 17(6):276. PubMed ID: 11712110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
    Kearney MH; Freda MC
    Res Nurs Health; 2005 Dec; 28(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 16287058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2002 May; 417(6885):103. PubMed ID: 12000917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
    Algase DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
    Grant MJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Dec; 31(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 25443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Editorial.
    Weisse T
    Eur J Protistol; 2015 Apr; 51(2):A1-2. PubMed ID: 26008765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.
    Provenzale JM; Stanley RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):848-54. PubMed ID: 16177399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
    Senturia SD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
    Downer M
    Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
    Fisher RS; Powers LE
    Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reviewing peer review.
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2006; 20(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 17058820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning to review.
    Freedman R
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Writing that matters.
    Hegyvary ST
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2005; 37(3):193-4. PubMed ID: 16342432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review in academic publishing: threats and challenges.
    Misra DP; Ravindran V
    J R Coll Physicians Edinb; 2019 Jun; 49(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 31188334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review: is it a social process?
    Quintana LM
    World Neurosurg; 2011; 76(1-2):41-2. PubMed ID: 21839939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.