These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19707997)

  • 1. [Meta-analyses in psychopharmacotherapy: garbage in--garbage out?].
    Weinmann S
    Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Sep; 36(6):255-7. PubMed ID: 19707997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
    Moher D; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Tugwell P; Moher M; Jones A; Pham B; Klassen TP
    Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(12):i-iv, 1-98. PubMed ID: 10374081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: "Bias in clinical intervention research".
    Hemilä H
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 May; 165(10):1219; author reply 1219-20. PubMed ID: 17426041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short on evidence. Evidence-based medicine in the witness box.
    Blair L
    Can Fam Physician; 1997 Mar; 43():427-9. PubMed ID: 9116512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Danger of misuse of meta-analyses for observational studies based on published data.
    Sauerbrei W; Blettner M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():33. PubMed ID: 11187567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The proof of efficacy in psychopharmacology: clinical studies, metaanalysis and evidence-based medicine.
    Kasper S
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 260(1):1. PubMed ID: 19838764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Homeopathy again: a questionable meta-analysis.
    Prescrire Int; 1998 Jun; 7(35):94-5. PubMed ID: 10342930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Are treatment effects or adverse effects of significance for the association between financing and conclusions in randomized trials?].
    Als-Nielsen BE; Chen W; Gluud CN; Gluud LL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1676-8. PubMed ID: 15174406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(42):5601. PubMed ID: 11059294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine: the supporting pillar of trial registration.
    Novara G; Ficarra V; Artibani W
    Eur Urol; 2009 Dec; 56(6):956-8. PubMed ID: 19775805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Editorial. Systematic review--what is it and how should it be used?
    Gross A
    Man Ther; 2004 Aug; 9(3):123-4. PubMed ID: 15245705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can non-randomized trials be considered to be equivalent to randomized trials in forensic mental health?
    Leese M
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 16470506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based urology in practice: intention-to-treat analysis.
    Mazel JW; Dahm P;
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):582-3. PubMed ID: 19493267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [How to develop evidence-based ophthalmology].
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 40(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 15268842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs.
    Rosner A
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 12975633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse events in randomized trials: neglected, restricted, distorted, and silenced.
    Ioannidis JP
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Oct; 169(19):1737-9. PubMed ID: 19858427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.