These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19709427)

  • 21. A robust method to analyze copy number alterations of less than 100 kb in single cells using oligonucleotide array CGH.
    Möhlendick B; Bartenhagen C; Behrens B; Honisch E; Raba K; Knoefel WT; Stoecklein NH
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67031. PubMed ID: 23825608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Normalization of Illumina Infinium whole-genome SNP data improves copy number estimates and allelic intensity ratios.
    Staaf J; Vallon-Christersson J; Lindgren D; Juliusson G; Rosenquist R; Höglund M; Borg A; Ringnér M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():409. PubMed ID: 18831757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multi-factor data normalization enables the detection of copy number aberrations in amplicon sequencing data.
    Boeva V; Popova T; Lienard M; Toffoli S; Kamal M; Le Tourneau C; Gentien D; Servant N; Gestraud P; Rio Frio T; Hupé P; Barillot E; Laes JF
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 30(24):3443-50. PubMed ID: 25016581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Random DNA fragmentation allows detection of single-copy, single-exon alterations of copy number by oligonucleotide array CGH in clinical FFPE samples.
    Hostetter G; Kim SY; Savage S; Gooden GC; Barrett M; Zhang J; Alla L; Watanabe A; Einspahr J; Prasad A; Nickoloff BJ; Carpten J; Trent J; Alberts D; Bittner M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jan; 38(2):e9. PubMed ID: 19875416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis.
    Huang J; Gusnanto A; O'Sullivan K; Staaf J; Borg A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17660206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization as a tool for analyzing the leukemia genome.
    Strefford JC; Parker H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 538():151-77. PubMed ID: 19277573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A statistical change point model approach for the detection of DNA copy number variations in array CGH data.
    Chen J; Wang YP
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 19875853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Zoom-in array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to detect germline rearrangements in cancer susceptibility genes.
    Staaf J; Borg A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 653():221-35. PubMed ID: 20721746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stationary wavelet packet transform and dependent laplacian bivariate shrinkage estimator for array-CGH data smoothing.
    Nguyen N; Huang H; Oraintara S; Vo A
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 20078226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ADaCGH: A parallelized web-based application and R package for the analysis of aCGH data.
    Díaz-Uriarte R; Rueda OM
    PLoS One; 2007 Aug; 2(8):e737. PubMed ID: 17710137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A genome-wide high-resolution array-CGH analysis of cutaneous melanoma and comparison of array-CGH to FISH in diagnostic evaluation.
    Wang L; Rao M; Fang Y; Hameed M; Viale A; Busam K; Jhanwar SC
    J Mol Diagn; 2013 Sep; 15(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 23800576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Array comparative genomic hybridisation testing in CHD.
    Hightower HB; Robin NH; Mikhail FM; Ambalavanan N
    Cardiol Young; 2015 Aug; 25(6):1155-72. PubMed ID: 25296170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A fast and flexible method for the segmentation of aCGH data.
    Ben-Yaacov E; Eldar YC
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i139-45. PubMed ID: 18689815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Smoothing waves in array CGH tumor profiles.
    van de Wiel MA; Brosens R; Eilers PH; Kumps C; Meijer GA; Menten B; Sistermans E; Speleman F; Timmerman ME; Ylstra B
    Bioinformatics; 2009 May; 25(9):1099-104. PubMed ID: 19276148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Functionally-focused algorithmic analysis of high resolution microarray-CGH genomic landscapes demonstrates comparable genomic copy number aberrations in MSI and MSS sporadic colorectal cancer.
    Ali H; Bitar MS; Al Madhoun A; Marafie M; Al-Mulla F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171690. PubMed ID: 28231327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. RJaCGH: Bayesian analysis of aCGH arrays for detecting copy number changes and recurrent regions.
    Rueda OM; Diaz-Uriarte R
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(15):1959-60. PubMed ID: 19420051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gene-resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using oligonucleotide expression microarrays.
    Auer H; Newsom DL; Nowak NJ; McHugh KM; Singh S; Yu CY; Yang Y; Wenger GD; Gastier-Foster JM; Kornacker K
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():111. PubMed ID: 17470268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Flexible and accurate detection of genomic copy-number changes from aCGH.
    Rueda OM; Díaz-Uriarte R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Jun; 3(6):e122. PubMed ID: 17590078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling recurrent DNA copy number alterations in array CGH data.
    Shah SP; Lam WL; Ng RT; Murphy KP
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i450-8. PubMed ID: 17646330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computational methods for identification of recurrent copy number alteration patterns by array CGH.
    Shah SP
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 123(1-4):343-51. PubMed ID: 19287173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.