These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19711685)

  • 1. Guidelines for disciplinary action from peer review.
    Guthrie M
    Physician Exec; 2009; 35(4):78-9. PubMed ID: 19711685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disciplinary careers of drug-impaired physicians.
    Holtman MC
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Feb; 64(3):543-53. PubMed ID: 17079061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guidelines for disciplinary action.
    Roseman E
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Sep; 18(9):53-6. PubMed ID: 10278687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Private investigation. A positive and enriching experience].
    Houle L
    Nurs Que; 1983; 3(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 6559291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Allegations of abuse against a NSW Health employee: new government guidelines.
    Lamp; 1996 Jul; 53(6):36. PubMed ID: 9313490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases.
    Leiker M
    WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A how-to for peer review.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2011 May; 473(7345):17. PubMed ID: 21544122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disciplinary procedures.
    Stewart IP
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1998 May; 15(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 9639193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in applications for peer-reviewed CNE.
    Kroeger B
    Nebr Nurse; 2007; 40(2):8. PubMed ID: 17591426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discipline of nurses: a review of disciplinary data 1996-2006.
    Kenward K
    JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 2008; 10(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 18776752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of the Cartwright Report upon the regulation, discipline and accountability of medical practitioners in New Zealand.
    Collins DB; Brown CA
    J Law Med; 2009 Feb; 16(4):595-613. PubMed ID: 19297869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician discipline--concerns and misconceptions.
    Paustian FF
    Nebr Med J; 1994 Nov; 79(11):359-62. PubMed ID: 7830837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doc discipline falling: report.
    Robeznieks A
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Apr; 38(16):14. PubMed ID: 18533294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review and the Patrick case.
    Boulanger WJ
    Wis Med J; 1988 Aug; 87(8):5. PubMed ID: 3176511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physician strategies are necessary in peer review.
    Bartek W
    Tex Hosp; 1985 May; 40(12):9. PubMed ID: 10272574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sham peer review: perversions of a powerful process.
    Pfifferling JH; Meyer DN; Wang CJ
    Physician Exec; 2008; 34(5):24-9. PubMed ID: 19456073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidelines for guidelines: content, accountability, peer review, and intellectual ownership.
    Emerson CH
    Thyroid; 2009 Nov; 19(11):1137-8. PubMed ID: 19888854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meeting more explicit peer review imperatives.
    Spath P
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Aug; 32(8):111-4. PubMed ID: 17763627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multidisciplinary peer review 'more objective'.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2008 Apr; 33(4):48-50. PubMed ID: 18689082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When should case be sent for external peer review?
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Jul; 32(7):94, 99-100. PubMed ID: 17685064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.