These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19712921)

  • 1. Does matching of internal and external facial features depend on orientation and viewpoint?
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Meinhardt G; Schwaninger A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19712921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time course of face matching by internal and external features: Effects of context and inversion.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Meinhardt G
    Vision Res; 2010 Jul; 50(16):1598-611. PubMed ID: 20570594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.
    Fletcher KI; Butavicius MA; Lee MD
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Aug; 99(Pt 3):379-94. PubMed ID: 17706001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain potentials and integration of external and internal features into face representations.
    Olivares EI; Iglesias J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Apr; 68(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 18295921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental changes in the microgenesis of face perception revealed by effects of context and inversion.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Zöllig J; Persike M; Martin M; Seiffge-Krenke I; Meinhardt G
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(12):1338-50. PubMed ID: 21527268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N; Jovanovic B
    Dev Sci; 2007 Jul; 10(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 17552935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Young children's difficulty in disregarding information from external features when matching unfamiliar faces.
    Sugimura T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 23896414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The first 100 milliseconds of a face: on the microgenesis of early face processing.
    Carbon CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):859-74. PubMed ID: 22403930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain potential correlates of the "internal features advantage" in face recognition.
    Olivares EI; Iglesias J
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Feb; 83(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 19948205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External facial features modify the representation of internal facial features in the fusiform face area.
    Axelrod V; Yovel G
    Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(2):720-5. PubMed ID: 20406694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features.
    Mondloch CJ; Dobson KS; Parsons J; Maurer D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(2):159-81. PubMed ID: 15388304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovering faces from memory: the distracting influence of external facial features.
    Frowd CD; Skelton F; Atherton C; Pitchford M; Hepton G; Holden L; McIntyre AH; Hancock PJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Jun; 18(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 22545929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces.
    Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 25203612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges.
    Goffaux V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 18166166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early and late temporo-spatial effects of contextual interference during perception of facial affect.
    Frühholz S; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19470392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERP study of viewpoint-independence in familiar-face recognition.
    Miyakoshi M; Kanayama N; Nomura M; Iidaka T; Ohira H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Aug; 69(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 18474403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B; Sorger B; Schiltz C; Goebel R
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):45-67. PubMed ID: 19338716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of internal and external facial features in 8- to 10-year-old children and adults.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Meinhardt G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():96-105. PubMed ID: 24769271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.