These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19712921)

  • 21. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrophysiological neural mechanisms for detection, configural analysis and recognition of faces.
    Anaki D; Zion-Golumbic E; Bentin S
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1407-16. PubMed ID: 17689102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalizing across different views of faces.
    Burke D; Taubert J; Higman T
    Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(16):2164-9. PubMed ID: 17572467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The context effect in face matching: Effects of feedback.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Meinhardt G
    Vision Res; 2011 Oct; 51(19):2121-31. PubMed ID: 21854801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing.
    Maurer D; O'Craven KM; Le Grand R; Mondloch CJ; Springer MV; Lewis TL; Grady CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1438-51. PubMed ID: 17204295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Qualitative differences in the exploration of upright and upside-down faces in four-month-old infants: an eye-movement study.
    Gallay M; Baudouin JY; Durand K; Lemoine C; Lécuyer R
    Child Dev; 2006; 77(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16942501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The time course of face matching for featural and relational image manipulations.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Meinhardt G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 21420660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Internal versus external features in triggering the brain waveforms for conjunction and feature faces in recognition.
    Nie A; Jiang J; Fu Q
    Neuroreport; 2014 Aug; 25(12):965-71. PubMed ID: 25003951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A combinatorial study of pose effects in unfamiliar face recognition.
    Van der Linde I; Watson T
    Vision Res; 2010 Mar; 50(5):522-33. PubMed ID: 20043938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The face of aging: sensitivity to facial feature relations changes with age.
    Murray JE; Halberstadt J; Ruffman T
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):846-50. PubMed ID: 20677879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Configural and featural processing during face perception: a new stimulus set.
    Van Belle G; De Smet M; De Graef P; Van Gool L; Verfaillie K
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 19363168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Orientation tuning of human face processing estimated by contrast matching in transparency displays.
    Martini P; McKone E; Nakayama K
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2102-9. PubMed ID: 16384592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Representations of familiar and unfamiliar faces as revealed by viewpoint-aftereffects.
    Ryu JJ; Chaudhuri A
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):4059-63. PubMed ID: 16996559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recognizing the face of Johnny, Suzy, and me: insensitivity to the spacing among features at 4 years of age.
    Mondloch CJ; Leis A; Maurer D
    Child Dev; 2006; 77(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 16460536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. It's what's on the outside that matters: an advantage for external features in children's word recognition.
    Webb TM; Beech JR; Mayall KM; Andrews AS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Jun; 94(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16530781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age-dependent differences in human brain activity using a face- and location-matching task: an FMRI study.
    Leinsinger G; Born C; Meindl T; Bokde AL; Britsch S; Lopez-Bayo P; Teipel SJ; Moller HJ; Hampel H; Reiser MF
    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord; 2007; 24(4):235-46. PubMed ID: 17700019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.