164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19713113)
1. Comparison of interval breast cancer rates for two-versus single-view screening mammography: a population-based study.
Seigneurin A; Exbrayat C; Labarère J; Colonna M
Breast; 2009 Oct; 18(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 19713113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.
Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Moss SM
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 9934650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.
Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program.
Lipasti S; Anttila A; Pamilo M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 20429762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of two view mammography compared with one view in the detection of small invasive cancers: further results from the National Health Service breast screening programme.
Blanks RG; Moss SM; Wallis MG
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 9275268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-view versus single-view mammography at subsequent screening in a region of the Dutch breast screening programme.
van Breest Smallenburg V; Duijm LE; den Heeten GJ; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; Fracheboud J; Plaisier ML; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Broeders MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2189-94. PubMed ID: 21906898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program.
Hofvind S; Skaane P; Vitak B; Wang H; Thoresen S; Eriksen L; Bjørndal H; Braaten A; Bjurstam N
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):437-43. PubMed ID: 16244251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age-specific interval breast cancers in New South Wales and meta-analysis of studies of women aged 40-49 years.
Taylor R; Page A; Bampton D; Estoesta J; Rickard M
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 15563775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
Thurfjell E
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. One-view versus two-view mammography in baseline screening for breast cancer: a review.
van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):971-6. PubMed ID: 1450833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Mass screening for breast cancer in Herault county. First results in women between 40 and 70 years old].
Daures JP; Peray P; Bousquet J; Stoebner A; Gouzes C; Lamarque JL; Laurent JC; Cherif Cheikh J; Boulet P; Pujol J
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 1583294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.
Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 16434585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening.
Wald NJ; Murphy P; Major P; Parkes C; Townsend J; Frost C
BMJ; 1995 Nov; 311(7014):1189-93. PubMed ID: 7488893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.
Skaane P; Skjennald A
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 15155893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of two view and one view mammography in the detection of small invasive cancers: results from the National Health Service breast screening programme.
Blanks RG; Moss SM; Wallis MG
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 9041485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
