These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19713378)

  • 1. 4.3 In-vitro genotoxicity tests to detect carcinogenicity: a systematic review.
    Müller L
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2009 Feb; 28(2-3):131-3. PubMed ID: 19713378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity utilizing a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests.
    Kim BS; Margolin BH
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 10618179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays: their use and interpretation.
    McGregor D
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340B():159-69. PubMed ID: 2203003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
    Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
    Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
    Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of rodent carcinogens and noncarcinogens using genetic toxicity tests: premises, promises, and performance.
    Zeiger E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 9927558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies of bronchodilators and antiasthma drugs.
    Brambilla G; Mattioli F; Robbiano L; Martelli A
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2013 May; 112(5):302-13. PubMed ID: 23374861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mutation research, genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.
    Martus HJ; Suter W
    Mutat Res; 2009 Jan; 672(2):135. PubMed ID: 19056513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The mouse carcinogenicity study is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides.
    Billington R; Lewis RW; Mehta JM; Dewhurst I
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Jan; 40(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 20144135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The micronucleus test and NTP rodent carcinogens: not so many false negatives.
    Galloway SM
    Mutat Res; 1996 Jun; 352(1-2):185-8. PubMed ID: 8676909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo erythrocyte micronucleus and transgenic rodent gene mutation tests to detect rodent carcinogens.
    Morita T; Hamada S; Masumura K; Wakata A; Maniwa J; Takasawa H; Yasunaga K; Hashizume T; Honma M
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 May; 802():1-29. PubMed ID: 27169373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple-endpoint in vitro carcinogenicity test in human cell line TK6 distinguishes carcinogens from non-carcinogens and highlights mechanisms of action.
    Chapman KE; Wilde EC; Chapman FM; Verma JR; Shah UK; Stannard LM; Seager AL; Tonkin JA; Brown MR; Doherty AT; Johnson GE; Doak SH; Jenkins GJS
    Arch Toxicol; 2021 Jan; 95(1):321-336. PubMed ID: 32910239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo.
    Kirkland D; Speit G
    Mutat Res; 2008 Jul; 654(2):114-32. PubMed ID: 18585956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative percent cell survival and positive response in the in vitro micronucleus test.
    Phelps JB; Hoffman WP; Garriott ML
    Mutat Res; 2003 May; 537(1):115-6. PubMed ID: 12742513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of metronidazole.
    Dobiás L; Cerná M; Rössner P; Srám R
    Mutat Res; 1994 Jun; 317(3):177-94. PubMed ID: 7515153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.