These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19714776)

  • 21. Princeton_TIGRESS: protein geometry refinement using simulations and support vector machines.
    Khoury GA; Tamamis P; Pinnaduwage N; Smadbeck J; Kieslich CA; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2014 May; 82(5):794-814. PubMed ID: 24174311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Completion and refinement of 3-D homology models with restricted molecular dynamics: application to targets 47, 58, and 111 in the CASP modeling competition and posterior analysis.
    Flohil JA; Vriend G; Berendsen HJ
    Proteins; 2002 Sep; 48(4):593-604. PubMed ID: 12211026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effective protein model structure refinement by loop modeling and overall relaxation.
    Lee GR; Heo L; Seok C
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1():293-301. PubMed ID: 26172288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust.
    Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():173-80. PubMed ID: 19705484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of disorder predictions in CASP8.
    Noivirt-Brik O; Prilusky J; Sussman JL
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():210-6. PubMed ID: 19774619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CASP8 results in context of previous experiments.
    Kryshtafovych A; Fidelis K; Moult J
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):217-28. PubMed ID: 19722266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Target domain definition and classification in CASP8.
    Tress ML; Ezkurdia I; Richardson JS
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):10-7. PubMed ID: 19603487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of automatic tools and human expertise in template-based modeling of CASP8 target proteins.
    Venclovas C; Margelevicius M
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():81-8. PubMed ID: 19639635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template-based modeling category.
    Read RJ; Chavali G
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():27-37. PubMed ID: 17894351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8.
    Ezkurdia I; Graña O; Izarzugaza JM; Tress ML
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():196-209. PubMed ID: 19714769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of the Pro-sp3-TASSER server in CASP8.
    Zhou H; Pandit SB; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):123-7. PubMed ID: 19639638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Driven to near-experimental accuracy by refinement via molecular dynamics simulations.
    Heo L; Arbour CF; Feig M
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1263-1275. PubMed ID: 31197841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. X-ray vs. NMR structures as templates for computational protein design.
    Schneider M; Fu X; Keating AE
    Proteins; 2009 Oct; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 19422060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Protein-binding site prediction based on three-dimensional protein modeling.
    Oh M; Joo K; Lee J
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():152-6. PubMed ID: 19768678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CASP10-BCL::Fold efficiently samples topologies of large proteins.
    Heinze S; Putnam DK; Fischer AW; Kohlmann T; Weiner BE; Meiler J
    Proteins; 2015 Mar; 83(3):547-63. PubMed ID: 25581562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A large-scale comparison of computational models on the residue flexibility for NMR-derived proteins.
    Zhang H; Shi H; Hanlon M
    Protein Pept Lett; 2012 Feb; 19(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 21933137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the usefulness of protein structure models for molecular replacement.
    Giorgetti A; Raimondo D; Miele AE; Tramontano A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():ii72-6. PubMed ID: 16204129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CAD-score: a new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models.
    Olechnovič K; Kulberkytė E; Venclovas C
    Proteins; 2013 Jan; 81(1):149-62. PubMed ID: 22933340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2.
    Ray A; Lindahl E; Wallner B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():224. PubMed ID: 22963006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. State-of-the-art bioinformatics protein structure prediction tools (Review).
    Pavlopoulou A; Michalopoulos I
    Int J Mol Med; 2011 Sep; 28(3):295-310. PubMed ID: 21617841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.