These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19715267)

  • 21. Determining corneal hysteresis and preexisting intraocular pressure.
    Sergienko N; Shargorodska I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 35(11):2033-4; author reply 2034-5. PubMed ID: 19878850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.
    Kucumen RB; Yenerel NM; Gorgun E; Kulacoglu DN; Oncel B; Kohen MC; Alimgil ML
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2096-8. PubMed ID: 19027566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contact-based stiffness sensing of human eye.
    Kurita Y; Kempf R; Iida Y; Okude J; Kaneko M; Mishima HK; Tsukamoto H; Sugimoto E; Katakura S; Kobayashi K; Kiuchi Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):739-45. PubMed ID: 18270012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [What to do if the intraocular pressure measurement does not appear reliable].
    Hamard P
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2010 Apr; 33(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 20347507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Incorporating corneal pachymetry into the management of glaucoma.
    Iester M; Mete M; Figus M; Frezzotti P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 19683164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with scleroderma using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
    Emre S; Kayikçioğlu O; Ateş H; Cinar E; Inceoğlu N; Yargucu F; Pirildar T; Oksel F
    Cornea; 2010 Jun; 29(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 20458219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Applanation pressure function in Goldmann tonometry and its correction.
    Śródka W
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2013; 15(3):97-106. PubMed ID: 24215153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties in patients with myotonic dystrophy.
    Rosa N; Lanza M; Borrelli M; Palladino A; Di Gregorio MG; Politano L
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 19019447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.
    Moreno-Montañés J; Maldonado MJ; García N; Mendiluce L; García-Gómez PJ; Seguí-Gómez M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):968-74. PubMed ID: 18326720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Biomechanical properties of the cornea in primary open-angle glaucoma].
    Eremina MV
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 19062551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical parameters of the cornea.
    Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Rasko A; Morad Y; Harstein M; Avni I; Zadok D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):715-9. PubMed ID: 19304094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser.
    Kynigopoulos M; Schlote T; Kotecha A; Tzamalis A; Pajic B; Haefliger I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 May; 225(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 18454372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Numerical study of the effect of corneal layered structure on ocular biomechanics.
    Elsheikh A; Ross S; Alhasso D; Rama P
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Jan; 34(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 19172467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry using a nonlinear finite element ocular model.
    Elsheikh A; Wang D; Kotecha A; Brown M; Garway-Heath D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1628-40. PubMed ID: 17006754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Corneal biomechanical properties during the menstrual cycle.
    Seymenoğlu G; Baser EF; Zerdeci N; Gülhan C
    Curr Eye Res; 2011 May; 36(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 21501072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ocular response analyzer and goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study of findings.
    Bayoumi NH; Bessa AS; El Massry AA
    J Glaucoma; 2010 Dec; 19(9):627-31. PubMed ID: 20179628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors influencing corneal biomechanical changes after microincision cataract surgery and standard coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Alió JL; Agdeppa MC; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Amparo F; Piñero DP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 36(6):890-7. PubMed ID: 20494758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after treatment with prostaglandin analog/prostamide.
    Ang GS; Wells AP
    J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(5):346; author reply 347. PubMed ID: 20543630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Influence of cornea thickness changes after refractive surgery on intraocular pressure measurements].
    Filipecka I; Gierek-Ciaciura S
    Klin Oczna; 2001; 103(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11605581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.