450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19715353)
1. Molecular modeling for screening environmental chemicals for estrogenicity: use of the toxicant-target approach.
Rabinowitz JR; Little SB; Laws SC; Goldsmith MR
Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1594-602. PubMed ID: 19715353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nature of the binding interaction for 50 structurally diverse chemicals with rat estrogen receptors.
Laws SC; Yavanhxay S; Cooper RL; Eldridge JC
Toxicol Sci; 2006 Nov; 94(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 16940337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles.
Liu H; Papa E; Gramatica P
Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Nov; 19(11):1540-8. PubMed ID: 17112243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Profiling the activity of environmental chemicals in prenatal developmental toxicity studies using the U.S. EPA's ToxRefDB.
Knudsen TB; Martin MT; Kavlock RJ; Judson RS; Dix DJ; Singh AV
Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 28(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 19446433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An integrated "4-phase" approach for setting endocrine disruption screening priorities--phase I and II predictions of estrogen receptor binding affinity.
Shi L; Tong W; Fang H; Xie Q; Hong H; Perkins R; Wu J; Tu M; Blair RM; Branham WS; Waller C; Walker J; Sheehan DM
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 12074393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of an average mammalian estrogen receptor-based QSAR model.
Mekenya O; Kamenska V; Serafimova R; Poellinger L; Brouwer A; Walker J
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Oct; 13(6):579-95. PubMed ID: 12479373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In silico prediction of harmful effects triggered by drugs and chemicals.
Vedani A; Dobler M; Lill MA
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(2 Suppl):398-407. PubMed ID: 16045954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting antitrichomonal activity: a computational screening using atom-based bilinear indices and experimental proofs.
Marrero-Ponce Y; Meneses-Marcel A; Castillo-Garit JA; Machado-Tugores Y; Escario JA; Barrio AG; Pereira DM; Nogal-Ruiz JJ; Arán VJ; Martínez-Fernández AR; Torrens F; Rotondo R; Ibarra-Velarde F; Alvarado YJ
Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 14(19):6502-24. PubMed ID: 16875830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Representation of chemical information in OASIS centralized 3D database for existing chemicals.
Nikolov N; Grancharov V; Stoyanova G; Pavlov T; Mekenyan O
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2537-51. PubMed ID: 17125194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure-based approach for the study of estrogen receptor binding affinity and subtype selectivity.
Salum LB; Polikarpov I; Andricopulo AD
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2243-53. PubMed ID: 18937440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variable selection and interpretation in structure-affinity correlation modeling of estrogen receptor binders.
Marini F; Roncaglioni A; Novic M
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1507-19. PubMed ID: 16309247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design and characterization of libraries of molecular fragments for use in NMR screening against protein targets.
Baurin N; Aboul-Ela F; Barril X; Davis B; Drysdale M; Dymock B; Finch H; Fromont C; Richardson C; Simmonite H; Hubbard RE
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2157-66. PubMed ID: 15554686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pharmacophore-based evolutionary approach for screening selective estrogen receptor modulators.
Yang JM; Shen TW
Proteins; 2005 May; 59(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 15726586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In silico screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models.
Liu H; Papa E; Walker JD; Gramatica P
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 17293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure-activity approach to the identification of environmental estrogens: the MCASE approach.
Cunningham AR; Cunningham SL; Rosenkranz HS
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 15113069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Activity profiles of 309 ToxCast™ chemicals evaluated across 292 biochemical targets.
Knudsen TB; Houck KA; Sipes NS; Singh AV; Judson RS; Martin MT; Weissman A; Kleinstreuer NC; Mortensen HM; Reif DM; Rabinowitz JR; Setzer RW; Richard AM; Dix DJ; Kavlock RJ
Toxicology; 2011 Mar; 282(1-2):1-15. PubMed ID: 21251949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volume learning algorithm significantly improved PLS model for predicting the estrogenic activity of xenoestrogens.
Kovalishyn VV; Kholodovych V; Tetko IV; Welsh WJ
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Sep; 26(2):591-4. PubMed ID: 17433745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of a minimal subset of receptor conformations for improved multiple conformation docking and two-step scoring.
Yoon S; Welsh WJ
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 14741014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
