BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19716109)

  • 1. Contrasting effects of interference and of breaks in interval timing.
    Gaudreault R; Fortin C; Macar F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 19716109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Basal ganglia, dopamine and temporal processing: performance on three timing tasks on and off medication in Parkinson's disease.
    Jones CR; Malone TJ; Dirnberger G; Edwards M; Jahanshahi M
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18378374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timing during interruptions in timing.
    Fortin C; Bédard MC; Champagne J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):276-88. PubMed ID: 15826230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability.
    Schmidt-Kassow M; Schubotz RI; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18987559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interrupting timing in interval production and discrimination: similarities and differences.
    Fortin C; Tremblay S
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):336-43. PubMed ID: 16309854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do we have a common mechanism for measuring time in the hundreds of millisecond range? Evidence from multiple-interval timing tasks.
    Merchant H; Zarco W; Prado L
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 99(2):939-49. PubMed ID: 18094101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mental fatigue and temporal preparation in simple reaction-time performance.
    Langner R; Steinborn MB; Chatterjee A; Sturm W; Willmes K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 19878913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time perception: manipulation of task difficulty dissociates clock functions from other cognitive demands.
    Livesey AC; Wall MB; Smith AT
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 16934301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity.
    Correa A; Triviño M; Pérez-Dueñas C; Acosta A; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 20566235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network.
    Coull JT; Nazarian B; Vidal F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2185-97. PubMed ID: 18457512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No evidence for qualitative differences in the processing of short and long temporal intervals.
    Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):141-71. PubMed ID: 15907778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of temporal difficulty on cerebrocerebellar interaction during visual duration discrimination.
    Shih LY; Yeh TC; Kuo WJ; Tzeng OJ; Hsieh JC
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 19818807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separation of the systems for color and spatial manipulation in working memory revealed by a dual-task procedure.
    Mohr HM; Linden DE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 17(2):355-66. PubMed ID: 15811245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.
    van der Lubbe RH; Havik MM; Bekker EM; Postma A
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automaticity and voluntary control of phase correction following event onset shifts in sensorimotor synchronization.
    Repp BH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):410-30. PubMed ID: 11999863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal recalibration to tactile-visual asynchronous stimuli.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 430(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 18055112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus complexity and prospective timing: clues for a parallel process model of time perception.
    Aubry F; Guillaume N; Mogicato G; Bergeret L; Celsis P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 18001688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.