These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

788 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19717147)

  • 1. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diversity of the P3 in the task-switching paradigm.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1411():87-97. PubMed ID: 21803343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive control mechanisms revealed by ERP and fMRI: evidence from repeated task-switching.
    Swainson R; Cunnington R; Jackson GM; Rorden C; Peters AM; Morris PG; Jackson SR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):785-99. PubMed ID: 14511532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequence effects in cued task switching modulate response preparedness and repetition priming processes.
    Jamadar S; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):365-86. PubMed ID: 20003149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: an ERP study of task switching.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1125(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 17087918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential effects of aging on processes underlying task switching.
    West R; Travers S
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 18403080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological correlates of preparation and implementation for different types of task shifts.
    Hsieh S; Wu M
    Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1423():41-52. PubMed ID: 22000079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are voluntary switches corrected repetitions?
    Vandamme K; Szmalec A; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20456659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Poboka D; Heathcote A; Michie PT
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Sep; 42(5):540-54. PubMed ID: 16176376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs.
    Kieffaber PD; Hetrick WP
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Jan; 42(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 15720581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: an ERP study of task-switching.
    Swainson R; Jackson SR; Jackson GM
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 16626653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials.
    Poulsen C; Luu P; Davey C; Tucker DM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):133-54. PubMed ID: 15922166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task reconfiguration and carryover in task switching: an event-related potential study.
    Hsieh S; Cheng P
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):132-45. PubMed ID: 16647689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.