103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19717223)
1. Joint appraisal of the radical prostatectomy specimen by the urologist and the uropathologist: together, we can do it better.
Montironi R; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Mazzucchelli R; Scarpelli M; Kirkali Z; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2009 Dec; 56(6):951-5. PubMed ID: 19717223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Penile length changes after radical prostatectomy.
Mulhall JP
BJU Int; 2005 Sep; 96(4):472-4. PubMed ID: 16104892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Open prostatolithotomy for the management of giant prostatic calculi.
Shah SK; Chau MH; Schnepper GD; Lui PD
Urology; 2007 Nov; 70(5):1008.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18068476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Technological process of biopsy investigation in the department of clinical pathology].
Kaliteevskiĭ PF
Arkh Patol; 1999; 61(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10664815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Prostatic melanosis].
Salinas Sánchez AS; Iñiguez de Onzoño Martín L; Fernández Millán I; Pastor Guzmán J; Martínez Martín M; Virseda Rodríguez J
Arch Esp Urol; 1993 Nov; 46(9):818-20. PubMed ID: 7508217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The robotic revolution: the seduction continues.
Nickel JC
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):583. PubMed ID: 20149202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. To demonstrate the benefits of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?
Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2006 Dec; 50(6):1160-1; discussion 1161-2. PubMed ID: 16930817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis.
Cupp MR; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Oesterling JE
J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. You can't resist the charms of the robot!
Kirby RS
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):582. PubMed ID: 20149201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical nerve-sparing laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Rhee HK; Tuerk IA
BJU Int; 2004 Aug; 94(3):449-74. PubMed ID: 15291893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for the macroscopic processing of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.
Association of Clinical Pathologists
J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):713-21. PubMed ID: 18326012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Endoscopy in urology].
Lindell O
Duodecim; 1999; 115(12):1349-57. PubMed ID: 11877836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Endocavitary echography in urology. Instrumentation (Bruel and Kjaer) and diagnostic contributions].
Réquin JL
J Urol (Paris); 1985; 91(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 3891872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.
Stolzenburg JU; McNeill A; Liatsikos EN
BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(7):909-28. PubMed ID: 18321324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Team-based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Sim HG; Yip SK; Lau WK; Tan YH; Wong MY; Cheng CW
Int J Urol; 2006 May; 13(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary on urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Litwin MS
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5 Suppl):S45-6. PubMed ID: 18405750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Endoscopic surgery in cervical and prostatic pathology. Personal experience].
Fainman N
Rev Argent Urol Nefrol; 1969; 38(1):98-9. PubMed ID: 5379762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pelvic neuroanatomy and radical prostatectomy with neurovascular preservation: quo vadis?
Martínez-Salamanca JI; Bianco FJ; Secín FP; Carballido JA
Eur Urol; 2009 Dec; 56(6):1092-3. PubMed ID: 19473750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of lasers in urology.
Willis RG
Br J Urol; 1994 Sep; 74(3):394. PubMed ID: 7953284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Malacoplakia of the prostate: report of a case].
Iwaki H; Konishi T; Hamaguchi A; Okada Y; Tomoyoshi T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1995 Nov; 41(11):895-7. PubMed ID: 8533694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
