These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. An examination of effect estimation in factorial and standardly-tailored designs. Allore HG; Murphy TE Clin Trials; 2008; 5(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 18375650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of nonregular fractional factorial designs in combination toxicity studies. Phoa FK; Xu H; Wong WK Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 47(9):2183-8. PubMed ID: 19505524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multifactor designs able to examine the interactions. Bao XL; Hu LP Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2012 Dec; 10(12):1371-4. PubMed ID: 23257128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies. Jaynes J; Wong WK; Xu H Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2543-60. PubMed ID: 26823156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When and how to use factorial design in nursing research. Krishnan P Nurse Res; 2021 Mar; 29(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 33269843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementing Clinical Research Using Factorial Designs: A Primer. Baker TB; Smith SS; Bolt DM; Loh WY; Mermelstein R; Fiore MC; Piper ME; Collins LM Behav Ther; 2017 Jul; 48(4):567-580. PubMed ID: 28577591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fractional Design Wizard: a computer program for cost-effective experimental research design. Landsheer JA; van den Wittenboer G Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Feb; 34(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 12060985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-factor designs unable to examine the interactions (part 1). Hu LP; Bao XL; Guo CY Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2012 Aug; 10(8):853-7. PubMed ID: 22883400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-factor designs unable to examine the interactions (Part 2). Hu LP; Bao XL; Lü CL Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2012 Sep; 10(9):966-9. PubMed ID: 22979926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two factorial designs, a complete 3 x 3 factorial and a central composite rotatable design, for use in binomial response experiments in aquatic toxicology. Edginton AN; Sheridan PM; Boermans HJ; Thompson DG; Holt JD; Stephenson GR Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2004 Feb; 46(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 15106673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Balanced 2(n) factorial designs when observations are spatially correlated. Sethuraman V; Raghavarao D J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):332-44. PubMed ID: 19212884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The power of approximate degrees of freedom tests in heteroscedastic factorial designs. Jan SL; Shieh G Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):871-83. PubMed ID: 25123908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incomplete factorial designs for randomized clinical trials. Byar DP; Herzberg AM; Tan WY Stat Med; 1993 Sep; 12(17):1629-41. PubMed ID: 8235181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]