These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19719361)

  • 1. Subject-centered scalability: the sine qua non of summated ratings.
    Drewes DW
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):258-74. PubMed ID: 19719361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurement of global self-esteem in dementia. Reliability and validity of Brinkman's self-esteem scale].
    Diesfeldt HF
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2007 Jul; 38(3):122-33. PubMed ID: 17642318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proportion of general factor variance in a hierarchical multiple-component measuring instrument: a note on a confidence interval estimation procedure.
    Raykov T; Zinbarg RE
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):193-207. PubMed ID: 21492128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.
    Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A graded response model for measuring person reliability.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):641-62. PubMed ID: 19159504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power equivalence in structural equation modelling.
    von Oertzen T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):257-72. PubMed ID: 19527562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.
    Levy R; Svetina D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a psychometric scale to assess satisfaction with dental care among Sri Lankans.
    Perera IR; Usgodaarachchi US
    Community Dent Health; 2009 Sep; 26(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 19780355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Graphical procedures for assessing person-fit in item factor analysis].
    Ferrando Piera PJ; Morales Vives F
    Psicothema; 2010 May; 22(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 20423642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the consistency of individual classification using short scales.
    Emons WH; Sijtsma K; Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 17402814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: experimental evidence from intra-individual effects.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Kramp U; García-Forero C; Gallardo-Pujol D; Coffman D
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 19363170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.
    Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(6):1292-306. PubMed ID: 17100485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computing and evaluating factor scores.
    Grice JW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):430-50. PubMed ID: 11778682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model-related factor score predictors for confirmatory factor analysis.
    Beauducel A; Rabe S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):489-506. PubMed ID: 19243679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The true-change model with individual method effects: reliability issues.
    Vautier S; Steyer R; Boomsma A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):379-99. PubMed ID: 17535486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-linear structural equation models with correlated continuous and discrete data.
    Lee SY; Song XY; Cai JH; So WY; Ma CW; Chan CN
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):327-47. PubMed ID: 18590605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.