These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19719361)

  • 21. The psychometricians' fallacy: too clever by half?
    Michell J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):41-55. PubMed ID: 17908369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detecting differential rater functioning over time (DRIFT) using a Rasch multi-faceted rating scale model.
    Wolfe EW; Moulder BC; Myford CM
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(3):256-80. PubMed ID: 12011510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
    Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes.
    Charter RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18649491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
    Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis.
    Slaney KL; Maraun MD
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):376-90. PubMed ID: 19072000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence curves for factor loadings.
    Kwan CW; Fung WK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):345-58. PubMed ID: 16293205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A brief, reliable measure of negative attitudes toward atheists.
    Bloesch E; Forbes GB; Adams-Curtis LE
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1161-2. PubMed ID: 15762396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Model uncertainty and multimodel inference in reliability estimation within a longitudinal framework.
    Alonso A; Laenen A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):338-52. PubMed ID: 22639936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.
    Klein Entink RH; Kuhn JT; Hornke LF; Fox JP
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 19271848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Classical test theory.
    DeVellis RF
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S50-9. PubMed ID: 17060836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reliability of multiple-component measuring instruments: improved evaluation in repeated measure designs.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):119-36. PubMed ID: 17535583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multilevel modelling: Beyond the basic applications.
    Wright DB; London K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):439-56. PubMed ID: 18664317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues.
    Hunsley J; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 14692841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Proportion of third-level variation in multi-level studies: A note on an interval estimation procedure.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):417-26. PubMed ID: 19793411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length.
    Feldt LS; Charter RA
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12741676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The a(d) coefficient as a descriptive measure of the within-group agreement of ratings.
    Kreuzpointner L; Simon P; Theis FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):341-60. PubMed ID: 20298645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A note on using alpha and stratified alpha to estimate the reliability of a test composed of item parcels.
    Rae G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):515-25. PubMed ID: 19017437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.