1618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19719742)
1. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter.
Han J; Lulic M; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 20666787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface.
Barewal RM; Oates TW; Meredith N; Cochran DL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):641-51. PubMed ID: 14579951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery.
Ostman PO; Hellman M; Wendelhag I; Sennerby L
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):77-83; discussion 84. PubMed ID: 16479765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface characteristics of electrochemically oxidized implants and acid-etched implants: surface chemistry, morphology, pore configurations, oxide thickness, crystal structure, and roughness.
Sul YT; Byon E; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):631-40. PubMed ID: 18807558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length.
Sim CP; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 20666786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
Oh JS; Kim SG; Lim SC; Ong JL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 19095473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Schätzle M; Männchen R; Balbach U; Hämmerle CH; Toutenburg H; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 19302392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants.
O'Sullivan D; Sennerby L; Meredith N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 15248883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant stability and bone density: assessment of correlation in fresh cadavers using conventional and osteotome implant sockets.
Cehreli MC; Kökat AM; Comert A; Akkocaoğlu M; Tekdemir I; Akça K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19681964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability.
Nedir R; Bischof M; Szmukler-Moncler S; Bernard JP; Samson J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):520-8. PubMed ID: 15355393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Yilmaz B; Bilecenoglu B; Ozbek EN
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18384400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival: a prospective case series study.
Rodrigo D; Aracil L; Martin C; Sanz M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 19958375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
