457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19719806)
1. Automated quality evaluation of digital fundus photographs.
Bartling H; Wanger P; Martin L
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 87(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 19719806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted, interactive fundus image processing for macular drusen quantitation.
Shin DS; Javornik NB; Berger JW
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1119-25. PubMed ID: 10366080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma.
Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; Morgan W; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L
J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10529928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography.
Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Maberley D; Morris A; Hay D; Chang A; Hall L; Mandava N
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of digital non-stereo color fundus photography as a screening tool in age-related macular degeneration.
Pirbhai A; Sheidow T; Hooper P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 139(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 15767053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Constructing retinal fundus photomontages. A new computer-based method.
Mahurkar AA; Vivino MA; Trus BL; Kuehl EM; Datiles MB; Kaiser-Kupfer MI
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1675-83. PubMed ID: 8675411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems.
Musadiq M; Patsoura E; Hughes S; Yang YC
Eye (Lond); 2003 Jul; 17(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 12855971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of fundus imaging in quantification of age-related macular change.
Bartlett H; Eperjesi F
Surv Ophthalmol; 2007; 52(6):655-71. PubMed ID: 18029272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2.
Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Neider MW; Thayer DW; Wabers HD; White JK; Pugliese AJ; Pugliese MF;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3269-82. PubMed ID: 18421079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-assisted image processing for a simulated stereo effect of ocular fundus and fluorescein angiography photographs.
Chen LJ; Yeh SI
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 20507012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of early diabetic retinopathy by computer processing of fundus images--a preliminary study.
Gilchrist J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 3454914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computer algorithm to quantitatively assess quality of digital optic disc images.
Moscaritolo M; Jampel H; Zimmer-Galler I; Knezevich F; Zeimer R
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20307051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-mydriatic digital macular photography: how good is the second eye photograph?
Aung KZ; Robman L; Chong EW; English DR; Giles GG; Guymer RH
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009; 16(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 19874148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The photographic screening for retinopathy of prematurity study (photo-ROP). Primary outcomes.
Photographic Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity (Photo-ROP) Cooperative Group
Retina; 2008 Mar; 28(3 Suppl):S47-54. PubMed ID: 18317345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mouse fundus photography and angiography: a catalogue of normal and mutant phenotypes.
Hawes NL; Smith RS; Chang B; Davisson M; Heckenlively JR; John SW
Mol Vis; 1999 Sep; 5():22. PubMed ID: 10493779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
