335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1972000)
1. Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Dawson AE; Norton JA; Weinberg DS
Am J Pathol; 1990 May; 136(5):1115-24. PubMed ID: 1972000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative DNA analysis and proliferation in breast carcinomas. A comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry.
Lee AK; Wiley B; Dugan JM; Hamilton WH; Loda M; Heatley GJ; Cook L; Silverman ML
Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):428-32. PubMed ID: 1329051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer cell kinetics: immunocytochemical determination of growth fractions by monoclonal antibody Ki-67 and correlation with flow cytometric S-phase and with some features of tumor aggressiveness.
Gasparini G; Pozza F; Meli S; Reitano M; Santini G; Bevilacqua P
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(6):2015-21. PubMed ID: 1776834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ploidy pattern and cell cycle in breast cancer as detected by image analysis and flow cytometry.
Luzi P; Bruni A; Mangiavacchi P; Cevenini G; Marini D; Tosi P
Cytometry; 1994 Jun; 18(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 7924702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of PCNA/cyclin immunohistochemistry with flow cytometric S-phase fraction in breast cancer.
Visscher DW; Wykes S; Kubus J; Crissman JD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1992; 22(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 1356517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA ploidy, proliferation, and neu-oncogene protein overexpression in breast carcinoma.
Lee AK; Wiley B; Loda M; Bosari S; Dugan JM; Hamilton W; Heatley GJ; Cook L; Silverman ML
Mod Pathol; 1992 Jan; 5(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1347424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of DNA content estimated by flow and image cytometry in breast tumor samples.
Jaszcz-Gruchała A; Swiatkiewicz I; Lackowska B; Gruchała A; Niezabitowski A
Pol J Pathol; 2001; 52(1-2):15-9. PubMed ID: 11505676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of proliferation activity in breast carcinoma by flow cytometry analysis of S-phase and quantitative analysis of MIB-1.
Masood S; Bui MM; Lu L
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 28(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 9846198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases.
Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between Ki-67 index and S-phase fraction on fine-needle aspiration samples from breast carcinoma.
Bozzetti C; Nizzoli R; Camisa R; Guazzi A; Ceci G; Cocconi G; Mazzini G; Naldi N
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 9349516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of cell proliferation in breast carcinoma using image analysis (Ki-67) and flow cytometric systems.
Kennedy JC; el-Badawy N; DeRose PB; Cohen C
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1992 Aug; 14(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 1388567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative image analysis of MIB-1 immunoreactivity. A comparison with flow cytometric assessment of proliferative activity in invasive carcinoma of the breast.
Ostrowski ML; Chakraborty S; Laucirica R; Brown RW; Greenberg SD
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1995 Feb; 17(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 7766265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of proliferation markers and their prognostic value for women with endometrial carcinoma. Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and flow cytometric S-phase fraction.
Nordström B; Strang P; Bergström R; Nilsson S; Tribukait B
Cancer; 1996 Nov; 78(9):1942-51. PubMed ID: 8909315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric deoxyribonucleic acid and cell cycle analysis of breast carcinomas by flow cytometry. Clinicopathologic correlations.
Visscher DW; Zarbo RJ; Jacobsen G; Kambouris A; Talpos G; Sakr W; Crissman JD
Lab Invest; 1990 Mar; 62(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 1690316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of DNA image cytometry in Libyan breast cancer.
Ermiah E; Abdalla F; Buhmeida A; Alshrad M; Salem N; Pyrhönen S; Collan Y
Oncology; 2012; 83(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 22906963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cell proliferation in breast carcinoma. Comparison of Ki-67 immunohistochemical study, DNA flow cytometric analysis, and mitotic count.
Isola JJ; Helin HJ; Helle MJ; Kallioniemi OP
Cancer; 1990 Mar; 65(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 2406010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of DNA quantitation in breast carcinoma with image cytometric analysis and in vitro fine-needle aspiration with flow cytometric analysis.
Lajoie G; Zbieranowski I; Demianiuk C; Knape WA; Edinger MG; Tubbs RR; Murray D
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Oct; 100(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 8213641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationships between image cytometric DNA index, proliferation fraction and multiploidy and conventional nuclear grade in breast carcinoma.
Smith FB; Zappi ME
Mod Pathol; 1993 Sep; 6(5):606-11. PubMed ID: 7504261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cell proliferation in renal cell carcinoma. A clinical study with special reference to prognosis.
Larsson P
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1994; 165():1-48. PubMed ID: 7871395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiparametric evaluation of flow cytometric synthesis phase fraction determination in dual-labelled breast carcinomas.
Visscher DW; Wykes S; Zarbo RJ; Crissman JD
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1991 Aug; 13(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 1718294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
